It's Wikipedia with a better interface than old-fashioned Wikipedia.
For instance: http://www.wikiwand.com/en/Red-backed_fairywren

Source: (of course Wikipedia ) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikiwand

What you want to say and what you do not want to say, it's of course up to you to decide. But a lawsuit seems to me quite meaningless, just like consult a lawyer. Finally, Wikipedia is just an 'online' thing.

You take it a bit too seriously. It's actually quite laughing. And no, I ask questions whenever I want, and do not let me offend by any person. Eric's comment was inappropriate and disqualifies him as a serious discussion partner.

ericbarbour wrote:Ooh, does it make your anus clench?

Too much LSD, isn't Eric?

.

Look at the Dutch Wikipedia article about "GLAM": https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/GLAM with an advertising for Wikimedia Netherlands! An advertising in the main namespace. It's something for their 'nl.wikimedia' site, but not to be published on Wikipedia. Garbage must go.

And here , Flip you can see the general costs. Form the 456.050 euro they are spending, 240.000 is wages, and with costs like renting a office, telecom, etc it's 291.050. So, form there 456.050 euro is 165.000 euro left for their totally ignorant activities. It should be interesting to have a speci...