The Rambling Man is saying what everyone is already aware of. Fact is that The Rambling Man is the part of the whole problem. Many editors quit Wikipedia because of him and admins are breaching policies only so that they can safeguard him.

That AE report was handled by heavily biased and involved admins.

It seems The Rambling Man has left Wikipedia now:-

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... =846780916

Maybe he will come back soon.

He has been blocked again and the original block discussion has been closed. So bad they can't afford to leave it opened for a week. Few of those editors who supported the block had to be sitebanned ages ago if Wikipedia was truthful to its own rules. Yes it was a waste of time for him to contribute...

He has been blocked again and the original block discussion has been closed. So bad they can't afford to leave it opened for a week. Few of those editors who supported the block had to be sitebanned ages ago if Wikipedia was truthful to its own rules. Yes it was a waste of time for him to contribute...

I don't think that he was aware of the discussion on AN. Looks nothing more than canvassing all editors off-wiki that oppose a specific editor and then canvass an admin who can close the banning/blocking discussion after 24 hours since it is the minimum limit.

Hasn't edited since their reaction to being DS/Infobox notified in March. You have to now look at this permalink to see what happened, since her talk late is set up to archive her old posts to a now deleted subpage. People either haven't noticed that is the case, or they have but don't care, or do ...

List is probably larger than that. There are about a few more incidents that haven't been mentioned here. Exactly, the on-going support for Calton's disruption on ARE is just another evidence though Bishonen may soon chime in to rescue him and most likely support sanction on the filer.