Anyone said: What is it, then, that makes you think he's some sort of critic? I was thinking about things such as his coining phrases like 'Wikipedia without content is just Facebook for ugly people', his stance against TFA and his objections to the overall appearance of the Main page. Sorry, I know...

I like Iridescent's honest talk page header

He uses a selection of images/captions for it; generally appropriate and very good.

Although, as far as I'm aware anyway, he doesn't participate in any forum sites and I appreciate this is your ranking of critics, have you considered Iridescent? Frequently there are thought-provoking debates on his talk page during which he often offers interesting critical viewpoints.

I haven't looked at Everipedia for a very long time, so skimmed a couple of articles on it this morning. It looks to have a problem with handling references? Notes also seem to be included as references. Looking at the home page, a lot is dedicated to 'models' and the like?

so I can laugh at spunk bubbles like that twat, who seems to think I'd have built up the knowledge I have from just 132 edits. Definitely a Kumioko sock, too stupid not to be. So pray tell then on what you base your 'extensive' experience? The only one you are making look foolish is .... .... well,...

I don't have a clue who you were on Wikipedia It's a well known fact CrowsNest was Mighty Morphin Army Ranger https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mighty_Morphin_Army_Ranger He was MMAR and several other sock accounts on WO - all banned. A grand total of 132 edits on Wikipedia so has tremendous ...

Regrettably, Mr Swan chooses his friends unwisely. It's known, for example, that he has a high regard for the likes of Cassianto and Blofeld. I find this both puzzling and troubling. But didn't everything become way less cordial between Mr Swan and Cassianto back in December 2017 after he blocked C...