Let me k now if you think this would work and let me know if you have any more questions. My case study is here https://rome-viharo.medium.com/aiki-wiki-wikipedia-we-have-a-problem-update-pt-3-bddc707bdd22 Hi! I read the article but I found the amount of links a bit overwhelming, I am interested on...

One more question I have is, if you had to calculate a "bias score" for a user in an automated way, how would you do it? This would be a difficult question but I can share some general pointers: a) if they focus in a very narrow subject area b) and get into editwars and are reverted frequently c) o...

Let me k now if you think this would work and let me know if you have any more questions. My case study is here https://rome-viharo.medium.com/aiki-wiki-wikipedia-we-have-a-problem-update-pt-3-bddc707bdd22 Hi! I read the article but I found the amount of links a bit overwhelming, I am interested on...

Compare it to a similar chart I made of Encyclopedia Britannica articles. You will instantly see that Wikipedia is NOT a "general-subject encyclopedia" in the usual definition. It's run by nerds and fanboys and cranks. So you get a heavy bias toward nerd/fanboy content. That is very interesting, th...

You can tell very powerful stories that way. If you talk about reverts and such like, your audience will only be those who already know what you're talking about (so probably already have an opinion). I would not focus on explaining about reverts etc, the idea would be that instead of going to http...

Hi, I want as a project to create a version of wikipedia that can show the bias it has. I'm thinking about processing it's history, then somehow displaying the bias on how the article's content was manipulated through it's history. Some ideas I've had are: - Have "reverts" of new content visible in ...