Carrite wrote: ↑

Wed May 22, 2024 12:45 am

Baby steps, baby steps.

They've had TWENTY-THREE YEARS of "baby steps". The toddler is old enough to VOTE and BUY LIQUOR in all 50 US states.

The Wiki-Putzes know DAMN well it's a problem. A BIG ONE. But they do a terrible job of managing it. https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/internet-dead-links-webpages-online-content-b2549215.html The effect means that vast amounts of news and important reference content are disappearing. Some 23 per c...

Now they're just killing it permanently with the vague suggestion that they'll implement something else.. "eventually". It's been a YEAR now. And it appears hell will freeze solidly over before they do anything. Meanwhile the Solar power in Australia article has two prominent dead charts: solarchar...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinzing

"References"? What "references"?

Such wonderful quality! (translated from de-WP, badly as usual)

The bill was successfully pushed by parents of those who lost children on the incel-adjacent suicide site. During their testimony to the Kansas legislature, the leading parental activist specifically called out actions which occurred on social media due to the owner of the incel site. https://www.k...

The last person to edit it was none other than Steven Pruitt (T-H-L). Proof, if it were needed, that the media doesn't know shit about Wikipedia. The guy has never even been vandalized. It's had two edits from unregistered users, both helpful. Rather amusingly, the super banned Neelix (T-C-L) edite...

You at Sucks have a greater chance here for distilled fury without listening to wankers like me and mine So, you admit it? :lol: And as for "calm and rational discussion"........numerous people have tried that, over and over, since 2004. Such things don't work with a "cultic network" like Wikipedia...

"Interesting" that no Wiki-Feminists are on the case here.....maybe if you get Genderdesk to write about it? (Good luck!)