Search found 4146 matches
- Thu May 23, 2024 9:06 am
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: Ohnoitsjamie
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1832
Re: Ohnoitsjamie
Thanks for the reply. There is no need for me to edit the english wikipedia and i don't want to hide my ip address. I want to show that Ohnoitsjamie made a mistake because he is confusing me with someone else and i want to prevent others getting blocked because of those wrong decisions. Please take...
- Thu May 23, 2024 3:48 am
- Forum: Content Issues
- Topic: Link Rot
- Replies: 4
- Views: 41
Re: Link Rot
Given the state of copyrights these days blindly replacing millions of dead links with internet scrappings could create a legal minefield for better or worse Despite endless struggle, WP still contains millions of "possible or fringe" copyright problems. Commons contains million of images scraped f...
- Wed May 22, 2024 8:15 pm
- Forum: Wikipediocracy talk
- Topic: Average Wikipediocrazy "discussion"
- Replies: 10
- Views: 525
- Wed May 22, 2024 7:44 pm
- Forum: Content Issues
- Topic: Link Rot
- Replies: 4
- Views: 41
Link Rot
The Wiki-Putzes know DAMN well it's a problem. A BIG ONE. But they do a terrible job of managing it. https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/internet-dead-links-webpages-online-content-b2549215.html The effect means that vast amounts of news and important reference content are disappearing. Some 23 per c...
- Sat May 18, 2024 3:11 am
- Forum: WMF staff/contractors and developers
- Topic: Graphs don't work because WMF developers are idiots
- Replies: 17
- Views: 4423
Re: Graphs don't work because WMF developers are idiots
Now they're just killing it permanently with the vague suggestion that they'll implement something else.. "eventually". It's been a YEAR now. And it appears hell will freeze solidly over before they do anything. Meanwhile the Solar power in Australia article has two prominent dead charts: solarchar...
- Fri May 17, 2024 8:56 pm
- Forum: Wikipediocracy talk
- Topic: Giraffe Stapler
- Replies: 2
- Views: 116
- Fri May 17, 2024 8:24 pm
- Forum: Content Issues
- Topic: Crap or questionable articles
- Replies: 491
- Views: 203519
Re: Crap or questionable articles
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinzing
"References"? What "references"?
Such wonderful quality! (translated from de-WP, badly as usual)
"References"? What "references"?
Such wonderful quality! (translated from de-WP, badly as usual)
- Fri May 17, 2024 7:40 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Sanctioned Suicide meat preservative overdose cult & whitewashing by Wikipedians (general thread, Kevinsanc, Freedom4U)
- Replies: 37
- Views: 26523
Re: Sanctioned Suicide meat preservative overdose cult & whitewashing by Wikipedians (general thread, Kevinsanc, Freedom
The bill was successfully pushed by parents of those who lost children on the incel-adjacent suicide site. During their testimony to the Kansas legislature, the leading parental activist specifically called out actions which occurred on social media due to the owner of the incel site. https://www.k...
- Fri May 17, 2024 6:58 pm
- Forum: Wikipediocracy talk
- Topic: Yngvadottir
- Replies: 1
- Views: 95
Re: Yngvadottir
The last person to edit it was none other than Steven Pruitt (T-H-L). Proof, if it were needed, that the media doesn't know shit about Wikipedia. The guy has never even been vandalized. It's had two edits from unregistered users, both helpful. Rather amusingly, the super banned Neelix (T-C-L) edite...
- Fri May 17, 2024 9:34 am
- Forum: Wikipediocracy talk
- Topic: Average Wikipediocrazy "discussion"
- Replies: 10
- Views: 525
Re: Average Wikipediocrazy "discussion"
You at Sucks have a greater chance here for distilled fury without listening to wankers like me and mine So, you admit it? :lol: And as for "calm and rational discussion"........numerous people have tried that, over and over, since 2004. Such things don't work with a "cultic network" like Wikipedia...