While people want Wikipedia to be like a public good like a public park, it will always fail at that goal because isn't because it's not run by the government. Non-governmental entities can't claim to be protectors of free speech the way public parks are. Free speech exists as a matter of governmen...

Welcome!

https://www.stephenharrison.com/the-editors

Remember that shill? Well he's back and worse than ever.

Masked User wrote: ↑

Fri Mar 29, 2024 7:37 am

E.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... an/Archive

Welcome back!

Welcome!

The most biased article I would say is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecuti ... s_in_China (which was until recently called "Uyghur Genocide")

Stierlitz wrote: ↑

Wed Mar 13, 2024 3:34 am

Bbb23sucks wrote: ↑

Wed Mar 13, 2024 3:27 am

Thanks for the post! But can you tell me why you created this alt?

I will have to reset the main account's password, but Stierlitz was used early on because of some jazz.

>was used early on because of some jazz.

Care to elaborate?

Thanks for the post! But can you tell me why you created this alt?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Workers_Party_of_Britain

Real-time edit warring. I can't really figure out the sides right now.

The party's founder's article dates back to 2003 and has been edit warred for most of its existence: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Galloway