ericbarbour wrote: ↑

Fri Jul 25, 2025 8:21 pm

I invoked that in my transformers deletion requests.

And they ignored you anyway. It's a "nerd subject" which means it gets royal treatment.

Same with role-playing games.

ericbarbour wrote: ↑

Tue Jul 15, 2025 6:16 pm

grandmaster-huon wrote: ↑

Mon Jul 14, 2025 5:43 pm

No kidding.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... nsformers)

Lol, I've seen that soooo many times......it's why they have a "Pokemon test". Which most Pokemon nerds ignore anyway.

I invoked that in my transformers deletion requests.

No kidding.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... nsformers)

Those "wars" are exactly what happened when I nominated some useless transformer character articles for deletion. Useless to whom? They're very useful to paramount global. I mean they complained when I nominated Transformers articles of some obscure characters for deletion because they were useless...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Decline-ai "This unblock request appears to have been written by a chatbot using a large language model. The purpose of unblock requests is to determine whether you, the human operating this account, understand why you were blocked – not to test a chatbot's a...

We cannot let Wikipedia bury things over and over, like they tried with the Patrick Bet-David BLP (which is still standing....for now.) Agreed. That was the THIRD AFD for Bet-David's article. Obviously the insiders dislike him and want to "vanish" him, and obviously (made inescapable when the Bushr...

Good luck getting any attention from the deranged MMO players. They will fight you tooth and nail. Oh look, you got a comment. Someone accusing you of being an AI. If for anything else, I'd like to hear your further answers to topics of AI neutrality and implementation. One last question, was this ...

Ognistysztorm wrote: ↑

Fri Jul 04, 2025 5:09 am

grandmaster-huon wrote: ↑

Thu Jul 03, 2025 3:04 pm

But quality over quantity, all the time.

Deletionism often leads to systemic biases, which ironically means a decline of quality.

But the vast majority of articles are stubs that are left to rot.

Why isn't the foundation doing anything about this? They are mainly PR now. I spent the last 15+ years telling people, IN PUBLIC, that the WMF is rotten and the WP insiders are even more rotten. You are delusional if you think anything will "change" suddenly. Or ever. I still expect the WMF will cr...