What? This is a website for Wikipedia criticism, not just saying "Wikipedia sucks because Wikipedi sucks". If we don't criticize Wikipedia or take action against it, what would be the point of having a forum? There is too much detailed information being presented here without a case being made. IT ...

Already covered: https://wikipediasucks.co/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=2648 Way too much .. its really simple 1) Weirdos and nimrods 2) Wikipedia sucks chow No need to be a wingnut.. by fire pissing with a fire hose.. this means you.. what are you a Wikipedia weirdo that was rejected or something? Ge...

Courtesy of Ognistysztorm: https://www.businessinsider.com/wikipedia-wikimedia-executive-salaries-sparking-debate-tech-sector-wages-2023-12?utm_source=reddit.com https://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Wikimedia-Foundation-Reviews-E38331.htm Hostile work environment with bullying Lack of innovation High ...

2) Nobody really reads Wikipedia any more; unless you are an Indian Cricket fan, soccer fan, or you are interested in celebrities and movies. That's a lot of people As a serious reference work.. nobody really reads it.. Wikipedia is just noise. Wingnuts are busy fighting wars on Wikipedia thinking ...

I'm still amazed that it continues to exist. Run by complete raving lunatics IMO. 1) Wikipedia is run by, and written, by raving lunatics doing their own thing. Could it just be as simple as that? 2) Nobody really reads Wikipedia any more; unless you are an Indian Cricket fan, soccer fan, or you ar...

Wing-nut = having a screw loose. Reveling in irrelevant nonsense is wing-nutty for sure. How about something serious such as stats on declining editors or pages views. Or https://www.econotimes.com/Wikipedias-volunteer-editors-are-fleeing-online-abuse-Heres-what-that-could-mean-for-the-internet-and-...

Some stupid wing-nut has obviously hacked an obscure book description to get some jolly's.

Nobody really cares. You can't fight wingnuttery on Wikipedia With wingnuttery.

Little mention of WGCZ

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?se ... arch&ns0=1

Compare to Mindgeek

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aylo

1) Aggrieved "Highway" Editors were harassed when they cited the Department of Transportation which is not allowed. Allowed sources, in the media, are becoming more nonsensical. In the case of highways and roads allowed sources are simply non-existent. 2) "Highway" editors were lambasted for researc...

https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2023/12/05/announcing-wikipedias-most-popular-articles-of-2023/ Based on the top articles list Wikipedia is similar to a chat board providing folks an opportunity to talk (or read about) about celebrities, movies, and sports. ChatGPT, 49,490,406 pageviews Sports:...