ericbarbour wrote: ↑

Wed Apr 24, 2024 7:27 pm

One last thing: JESUS FUCKIN CHRIST. The incel article is now 194k bytes long. Purified editwar garbage. Molly is still the #1 contributor. SHE can't stop picking at scabs either.

She feeds on their pain.

adamovicm wrote: ↑

Fri Apr 19, 2024 7:10 pm

Are you saddened by the news?

Send not to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.

ericbarbour wrote: ↑

Fri Apr 19, 2024 9:08 pm

Molly claiming that "Wikipedia is all there is left of the internet" or something.....

Bullshit Sucks is all that's left. Sucks or GTFO got it Molly?

After much blathering, the Mickey Mouse Club ordered the setup of a "VRT" system to submit COI reports to themselves directly. How can we simulate the virtues of transparency while keeping everything a secret? Historically, this "private evidence" process has resulted in those who provide it being ...

There is now a Brooke Vibber day. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Brooke_Vibber_Day Here beeth an list-o'-kooks. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Brooke_Vibber_Day&action=history Why did you change away from the version we had consensus for, that Brooke said she liked, an...

The longer the time goes, the higher the chances that the UAP community will branch out into wider anti-Wikipedia activism as they discover that the controversy about Susan Gerbic is not an isolated incident at all. I doubt their activism will go beyond trolling a selected fewish people. They corre...

Ognistysztorm wrote: ↑

Fri Apr 05, 2024 8:57 am

Mandating real names on websites is not really a guarantee to safeguard against abuse

And locking your front door is no guarantee that no one will break into your home.

Pretty funny advice coming from a burglar.

As usual, the Signpost published a response extolling the virtues of their system, while trying to discredit the WJC report https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2024-03-29/Special_report If there is some other website which provides greater transparency into its administrative...

I really don't think that anti-Semitic bias is one of the big neutrality problems on Wikipedia - far from it. Generally it isn't. There's no shortage of editors who devoted to making sure of that, sometimes to a fault. What made this different was the obscurity of the dispute to anglophone advocacy...

https://www.stephenharrison.com/the-editors It's a NOVEL. Instead of spewing his usual propaganda, he's going to make fiction about Wikipedian-like freaks. I detect incoming cringe here. That nit can barely write "plain journalism" and making a fictional story seems like he wants to screw himself.....