Search found 480 matches

by Kumioko
Fri Feb 12, 2021 9:51 am
Forum: Wikipedia In The Media
Topic: "Universal Code of Conduct"
Replies: 7
Views: 320

Re: "Universal Code of Conduct"

If they really want to show the new code of conduct isn't a joke, they should start with this 10:
- floquenbeam
- beeblebrox
- alexz
- binksternet
- beyondmyken
- highinbc
- neiln
- hasteur
- worm that turned for being a lying 2 faced weasel
- pretty much any wiki traitor who has ever been on arbcom.
by Kumioko
Sat Feb 06, 2021 12:57 pm
Forum: Wikipedia In The Media
Topic: "Universal Code of Conduct"
Replies: 7
Views: 320

Re: "Universal Code of Conduct"

This is nothing more than a hostile takeover of the wikis by the wikimedia foundation. Anyone think its a coincidence katherine maher resigned hours later? Ask the WMF about banning me for advocating the volunteer admins follow the rules! This isn't about conduct! Its about control! They know as wel...
by Kumioko
Fri Feb 05, 2021 12:54 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Katherine Maher stepping down
Replies: 1
Views: 148

Katherine Maher stepping down

It looks like there was a post about an hour ago notifying the world that Katherine Maher the CEO of the Wikipedia foundation will be stepping down in April. If i had to make a guess given her background I would say she is accepting a job somewhere in supporting the Biden administration, but it's ha...
by Kumioko
Wed Jan 06, 2021 9:31 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Ivan vector loses his job
Replies: 4
Views: 387

Ivan vector loses his job

According to WP:BN Ivanvector lost his job...like terminated abruptly and couldn't clear his history so was concerned someone could access his Wikipedia account. I wondervifvhis using his work computer to edit Wikipedia had anything to do with getting terminated!
by Kumioko
Thu Dec 24, 2020 3:05 pm
Forum: Wikipedians
Topic: Tisane got his little white ass nailed again
Replies: 2
Views: 254

Re: Tisane got his little white ass nailed again

I saw that article here over a week ago but didn't realize he edited wikipedia. Just goes to show there's just too much illicit activities by the wikipedia community for any one critic.

Banned or not, I think we all know he still likely edited. I'm rather surprised they didn't make him an admin.
by Kumioko
Wed Dec 23, 2020 3:19 am
Forum: Content Issues
Topic: My challenge removing a link to child porn
Replies: 5
Views: 469

Re: My challenge removing a link to child porn

Yeah I really have nothing positive to say about Johnuniq. He never had one original thought in his life. He is a good example of the type of shit bag that becomes an admin on wikipedia.
by Kumioko
Sun Dec 06, 2020 7:57 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Fae indeffed on EnWP
Replies: 7
Views: 568

Fae indeffed on EnWP

It seems chronic sexual deviant Fae has also been indeffed on the English Wikipedia for an obvious and blatant violation of his Arbcom sanction. So that makes at least 2, longterm, high output editors pushed out in the last month or so.
by Kumioko
Sun Dec 06, 2020 7:00 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Indef ban for Koavf
Replies: 1
Views: 360

Indef ban for Koavf

It looks like Koavf has received yet another ban, this time it seems, for edit warring. This character has been blocked nearly 30 times over the years but because he's amassed nearly 2.5 million edits the community has given him a pass for being g a jerk. Looks like his time has come to an end and f...
by Kumioko
Wed Dec 02, 2020 3:21 am
Forum: Wikipedians
Topic: Charlottes Web vs Gorilla Warfare
Replies: 3
Views: 389

Re: Charlottes Web vs Gorilla Warfare

As with all arbs and.most admins, if Molly said it was raining outside I would go to the window and check for myself. She is morally bankrupt and would say whatever she had to to get her way. Not only that, she hasn't done a single edit of value in over 10 years.
by Kumioko
Thu Oct 15, 2020 4:00 pm
Forum: Content Issues
Topic: Article “Criticism of Wikipedia” is write-protected!
Replies: 6
Views: 1152

Re: Article “Criticism of Wikipedia” is write-protected!

Like you Im surprised they have tolerated this articles existence. They could have quite easily waived the not normally flag and deleted it regardless of the merits and then just blocked anyone who contested as they normally do.