Internet was kind of "fun" back in the day when it was more mysterious.

Things were not so easy to find and with fewer content we had a somewhat limit on what we could find. But now it's much easier to find stuff.

Since the media seldomly questions/criticizes Wikipedia, have critiques made an effort to send them content?

I might have mentioned this before or maybe not. But he follows "community consensus" as long as it's neutral or if it works in his favor. But a few years ago, he quit his administrative post temporarily to protest a decision on de-sysopping one of his favorites to "protest" it. He blocked me citing...

NadirAli wrote: ↑

Sat Sep 05, 2020 5:13 am

http://www.skepticalaboutskeptics.org/w ... -skeptics/

Thank you.

Just what a reporter using Wikipedia needs. A celebrity to tell them https://www.youtube.com/shorts/mFcJVUZNRDA

I learned the hard way. My caffeine consumption became so bad that I needed to go to a hospital in the middle of the night. Then in 2014 I drank tea that contained too much sodium, causing me the same problems. I ran into a walk-in clinic (bad idea) and bad stuff happened to me there. Some bad thing...

https://theface.com/life/inside-the-wor ... ket-newtab

“You don’t get glory. You don’t get recognition beyond a small community of media editors. You certainly don’t get money”

I got an email on the Wikimedia Foundation 2022 Board of Trustees elections.

I'm eligible to vote. Who should i vote for?