Trailblazer101 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Trailblazer101 also has an account he links to it in his wikipedia user page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Trailblazer101 Going by this guy's bio on x formerly Twitter the guy seems to be proud of being a wikipedia editor I wonder who wants to t...

What wait they over threw Jimbo?

She does look like Bitch if you ask me, and she has been made an admin back in 2007: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Elonka https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... p/Elonka_3

so she has had best part of 16 years to abuse her posistion

Another article is an example of Wikipedia wrong priorities. Whatever films make at the box office is irrelevant.

It might be accurate to say Jimmy Wales was and still might be the only person in the world who thinks Wikipedia should have pages on internationally known South African eateries if they're black owned and owe their existence to post-apartheid economic stimulus. And because Jimmy Wales ate there. Y...

I can do it in two words:

Wikipedia SUCKS.

Oh look another Russian guy who found Jesus. and as with Jesus, it depends on which gospel you ask whether he resurrected or not

I would suggest that the majority of Marvel-related Articles are crap I have probably mentioned that before this one is particularly bad https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marvel_Entertainment Whats wrong with it? 1. TV shows included there that shouldn't be there. Marvel Entertainment never produced any...

If you think THAT's bad, check out Wikinews sometime. ALWAYS weeks or months out of date. I'm still amazed that it continues to exist. Run by complete raving lunatics IMO. Currently according to Wiki news Queen of Denmark is set to abdicate on January 14. January 14 was now more than month ago.

Wikipedia claims a bunch of junk is a reliable source and then cites it.
One man trash is another treasury.