Search found 4016 matches
- Fri Feb 23, 2024 8:00 pm
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: Tamzin RfA
- Replies: 117
- Views: 18361
Re: Tamzin RfA
That's very funny. "Ask for help" with mental problems? I've seen dozens of Wiki-addicts ask for help on WP somewhere. Usually they were ignored, dismissed, or (occasionally) BLOCKED. Wikipedia is totally dependent on people with mental problems. They can't "help" people because then such people mig...
- Thu Feb 22, 2024 10:18 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: "NoFap" on Wikipedia
- Replies: 9
- Views: 19557
Re: "NoFap" on Wikipedia
thanks, and in case nobody noticed it:
- Thu Feb 22, 2024 9:47 pm
- Forum: Content Issues
- Topic: Re: Paid Editing on WP is permissible
- Replies: 341
- Views: 183043
Re: Paid Editing on WP is permissible
https://xtools.wmcloud.org/articleinfo/en.wikipedia.org/Zephyr_Teachout She's a big Bernie Sanders fan and a complete flop as a candidate for public office. Hippie parents gave her a colorful name (probably), making her stick out from the crowd of usually-progressive law professors. Otherwise, who t...
- Tue Feb 20, 2024 7:53 pm
- Forum: Political
- Topic: Leaks of documents related to Chinese governmental spying operations
- Replies: 6
- Views: 613
Re: Leaks of documents related to Chinese governmental spying operations
Nope, I was thinking about this one instead: https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/4703442 Doesn't mean " Softlemonades " and "Chimney Sweepa" and whoever aren't connected to the Chinese WP abuse by CCP-connected editors. Often the same people working from the same organization. WPers are so fond o...
- Tue Feb 20, 2024 2:59 am
- Forum: Political
- Topic: Leaks of documents related to Chinese governmental spying operations
- Replies: 6
- Views: 613
Re: Leaks of documents related to Chinese governmental spying operations
There might be a slim chance that the leak will implicate Softlemonades and Genabab, who were reported by Taiwan News as suspected CCP agents for their POV tampering of articles two years ago. Assuming you're talking about this? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Wikimedia_Foundation_actions_on_the...
- Mon Feb 19, 2024 8:14 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: "NoFap" on Wikipedia
- Replies: 9
- Views: 19557
Re: "NoFap" on Wikipedia
This seems interesting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Tamzin#Conduct_by_NeuroSex/tgeorgescu Okay, that's interesting -- but you should look thru the archives of Tamzin's talkpage to see how much INSANITY she attracts. And always has. Look at the oldest archive from 2012; it [https://en.wi...
- Mon Feb 19, 2024 9:30 am
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: Koavf reverts Doug Weller's revert to Antifa, Bishonen blocks Koavf, and many accusations of trolling and "admin abuse"
- Replies: 19
- Views: 1174
Re: Koavf reverts Doug Weller's revert to Antifa, Bishonen blocks Koavf, and many accusations of trolling and "admin abu
this remark sure looks like the thrill is gone. Dunno if Boing will really quit, but that thread was talking about Italian WP maniac Vituzzu. And I have a little bit of old dirt to share. It-WP suffers from the same insane behaviour by its administrative corps as en-WP. For an example, consider the...
- Sun Feb 18, 2024 11:47 pm
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: Tamzin RfA
- Replies: 117
- Views: 18361
Re: Tamzin RfA
Discord.....just ugh. Even worse than IRC, what an achievement.....can just imagine what she tries to pull on the WP channels. Every day, over and over, until they tell her to shut it.badmachine wrote: ↑Sun Feb 18, 2024 10:50 pmi would write one but alls i know is that she participates in wikipedia Discord chats.
- Sun Feb 18, 2024 10:12 pm
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: Tamzin RfA
- Replies: 117
- Views: 18361
Re: Tamzin RfA
if you find yourself spending more time talking about the people who write wikipedia than being one of those people, remember that you can fix that today: then unblock me you retarded skank. Hah. Did the maniac ask for desysop and change her mind already? I did not even bother to check. Anyway, do ...
- Sun Feb 18, 2024 10:00 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Wikipedians are unable to establish any coherent definition for "incel"
- Replies: 18
- Views: 21219
Re: Wikipedians are unable to establish any coherent definition for "incel"
User:FeydHuxtable is now arguing with the dwindling [[incel]] page patrollers about the definition of "incel", making a few claims https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Incel#Incel_As_a_Form_of_Sexual_Slander Oh, we're supposed to take that nerd "seriously"? He has this on his userpage: https://en.wik...