Oddly the post about me seems very popular too.

Even with the not too subtle PS.

Graaf Statler wrote:

Dysklyver wrote:I feel something got lost in translation there...

I don't think so. There are people who understand very, very wel what I am saying. And others not. But I think Sashi does....

Yeah I am normally quite good at understanding what you mean, but these "smoke curtains" have me confused.

I feel something got lost in translation there...

This is literally hilarious.

I saw the initial draft and I reckon the end result is probably more accessible. I have no real opinion on whether this research is very accessible, indeed it is probably more of a starting point since it is no way complete (yet). For example: It doesn't yet cover citations without URLs It doesn't y...

It's called gaslighting, and it's a popular tactic on some parts of the internet. Simply deny what is blatantly true, even in the teeth of evidence on the same screen as your denial. It's astonishingly hard to believe that someone is telling barefaced lies and so the reader tends to rationalise it ...

Genuinely fascinating.

And in my second legal blog, I explore how really the realm of copyright is much to big to deal with in a week, but for those who don't mind the incomplete rant against US copyright law, it's there... Posts about named Wikipedians are much more popular than any other posts, I think that will end up ...

Maybe someone should tell dear Ritchie Swan that he just isn't putting forward very good candidates and is forgetting to massage the records so they pass.

Looks like blog 3 won't be very complimentary. Of course I didn't expect him to retire and was surprised he said he was going to, so the fact he isn't now going to retire in no way surprises me, but does show a certain lack of integrity. His turn around was less than a week from brushing off the dra...