[...] Really? This is how low you're willing to stoop? Thanks site exists so serious critics can be divorced from the moronic ramblings of illiterate idiots like ATG. So you choose to become his clone? Sad. Dysklyver should not have to a read to such ignorant reviews of his work. And Everipedia des...

No explanation as to why anyone should want to read it, I note. Seems to be a recurring pattern when Ponzipedia is concerned. A quick look at the content reveals no particular reason why anyone would want to read it. Indeed, there's no clear explanation of what it is supposed to be. An omnium gathe...

No explanation as to why anyone should want to read it, I note. Seems to be a recurring pattern when Ponzipedia is concerned. Everipedia has no inclusion guidelines, you can make an article about anything. Everipedia makes a great business directory. Everipedia’s blockchain hosting technology allow...

For another view on the subject, see Ponzipedia! at the Wiki Cabal blog.

Wikipedia is a addictive after all. Is it? I've never found it to be so. [...] You've fallen for the fallacy of extension. In this case in the formal sense of extending "Wikipedia is addictive", in the sense of many, most or the typical players are addicted" being illegitimately exte...

Their blog Can Beethoven send takedown requests? Betteridge's Law : No. Scroll down to September 3 Wikipedia contributors already work hard to catch and remove infringing content if it does appear. This system, which is largely driven by human efforts, is very effective at preventing copyright infri...

Yes, but don't get me wrong, Paul and I talked this over. Because of course I am not the only person with this thoughts. And believe me, the mangement and Mahbod Moghadam, what is a extreem sympathetic guy, listen too me. The don't block me, the don't expel me. They say we have to talk this over, c...

It's a word bandied about a lot so I thought I'd summarise a popular article on the subject Current approach is to use a list of criteria. ⋅ Uncaring -- callous unconcern for feelings of others. Poor at detecting fear in others. High threshold of disgust ⋅ Shallow emotions -- suc...

I suppose it depends what you think Wikipedia's game is. If you think it's to provide some kind of encyclopaedia, then, no, writing more articles about people you have a grudge against instead of fixing the million or so defective ones is not going to be a winning strategy. If you think it's an addi...

[...] a superficially polite attempt to get Paul to shut up [...] For reasons which I expanded on in response to Graaf's polite and collegial request I don't think that Everipedia is a good thing. I do think it would help this board if threads on Everipedia were to be better organised, marshalled i...