You should find a way to release these materials to the media, just saying. This is perhaps a one in a lifetime opportunity to destroy the mass delusion that Wikipedia is sacrosanct and infallible. Imagine if we did that with all of the evidence we had, the Internet would hate Wikipedia overnight.

As Eric Barbour said before, a wikipedia alternative wouldn't work and would at best be merged into the larger site. But what about a wikipedia revolution? I think Wikipedia in its current form is completely broken, but I don't think the idea of a community-run encyclopedia is inherently flawed. Let...

Here's Drmies appearing to make a personal attack against….himself?? Lol.

You'd obviously have better luck finding him there than me. The cached version of his now deleted Wikipedia biography begins like this.... Michel Aaij is a Dutch-born American scholar of Old English language and literature, who specializes in the study of medieval poetry. He is an associate profess...

It’s the worst of both worlds: Without hierarchy you have the disadvantage of lack of leadership, but with the advantage of open and democratic collaboration without strict rules. With more hierarchy you gain of having the best users at the top of leadership, but less collaboration and collectivizat...

The "B" stands for his two favorite activities, blocking and bullying. And the "23" represents how many hours a day he does them.

If you had to rank them, what do you think the five worst Wikipedia admins would be? Obviously bbb23 is #1, but what about the others? There are some good contenders like Drmies, Yamla, Materialscientist, etc. But who exactly would you rank for the top five?

I think that any user who can’t behave civilly towards other users should barred from editing in general.

Especially egregious example

He seems to think that all other users are inferior to him at editing and programming

You can see just how abusive he is here