Search found 417 matches
- Wed Jul 24, 2019 12:43 am
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: Fram
- Replies: 448
- Views: 117336
Re: Fram
m This is progress. Its progress because the Wikipedia community cannot govern itself responsibly, and banning them is the only responsible thing to do under the circumstances. -- The Wikipedia community is horribly toxic, by which I mean it is comprised of a predominantly white male culture in comp...
- Sun Jul 21, 2019 10:39 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Help evade
- Replies: 24
- Views: 15813
Re: Help evade
Be sure to disable the Autoblock tracking cookie: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Autoblock#Cookie_block I don't remember it's name. This page says: *BlockID https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Autoblock#Tracking I usually just disable (block) all cookies from en.wikipedia.org, and go to incognit...
- Fri Jul 19, 2019 11:29 am
- Forum: Bbb23
- Topic: Bbb23 admin abuse
- Replies: 300
- Views: 140281
Re: Bbb23
My general impression of Bbb23 is very good, and that, along with the quality of the three co-nominators, is sufficient for me to support his candidacy. Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:30, 6 July 2019 (UTC) Oh, so it's that easy to buy his loyalty... I was doing it the wrong way Good summary, btw. BTW, how...
- Mon Jul 08, 2019 1:42 am
- Forum: Bbb23
- Topic: Bbb23 admin abuse
- Replies: 300
- Views: 140281
Re: Bbb23
I could start listing the times blocked editors have, with the full knowledge and acquiescence of Administrators, used their talk page for purposes other than requesting an unblock, including getting others to proxy for them, and I would not be finished by morning. There's a precedent for a case of...
- Mon Jul 08, 2019 1:37 am
- Forum: Bbb23
- Topic: Bbb23 admin abuse
- Replies: 300
- Views: 140281
Re: Bbb23
Bbb23's treatment of Aron Manning is downright trollish. He refuses to read Aron's arguments, then accuses Aron of IDHT and revokes his talkpage access. Lol that day was hilarious Someone noticed it? 4 admins were "partying" on my talk page, to make sure, this groundless block remains in ...
- Sun Jul 07, 2019 8:59 pm
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: NinjaRobotPirate: checkuser tool abuse 2019 June
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3557
NinjaRobotPirate: checkuser tool abuse 2019 June
The shortest CheckUser (CU) block of history: 15:32 - “Since you’re so enamored of Arbcom, you can appeal to them. This is now a CU block. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:32, 29 June 2019 (UTC)” 16:21 - “You know what, I don’t even care any more. It’s no longer a CU block, and I don’t want to have anythi...
- Sun Jul 07, 2019 8:42 pm
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: Fram
- Replies: 448
- Views: 117336
Re: Fram
While the leading admins of enwiki were acting like the world's gonna end, a high-profile checkuser-admin abused his power, to block me for good, with practically zero chance to appeal. He did so by blocking my main and 2 inactive alt accounts with the obviously false allegation of abusive use of mu...