More than a month later: it's still there. And links to the stalking-scandal article. (Which is included in three categories, but NOT in Category:EBay. Betting $100 that Josh "had a few words" with various people.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EBay#Stalking_scandal
Search found 4016 matches
- Mon Dec 07, 2020 8:07 pm
- Forum: Content Issues
- Topic: Josh Gordon and eBay
- Replies: 21
- Views: 11299
- Mon Dec 07, 2020 2:09 am
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: Fae indeffed on EnWP
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4074
Re: Fae indeffed on EnWP
Might as well list the Wikipediocracy thread, even it if is full of Vigina spluttering. http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=38&t=11693 Even funnier: Scott "Scottywong" Wieser, one of Wikipedia's worst administrators of all time, is now on Wikipediocracy shrieking at all and sundry for "o...
- Mon Dec 07, 2020 1:49 am
- Forum: Wikipediocracy talk
- Topic: Vigilant!!!
- Replies: 143
- Views: 86811
Re: Vigilant!!!
Is he finally starting to lose any touch with reality? Watching him complain about Fae is bizarre: pot vs. kettle kind of thing. http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=278547#p278547 hmmmm...... Ashley, my man, you're a radioactive waste ship sailing in international waters. Nobody wants yo...
- Mon Dec 07, 2020 1:25 am
- Forum: Content Issues
- Topic: Crap or questionable articles
- Replies: 482
- Views: 188543
Re: Crap or questionable articles
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:The_Importance_of_Brevity Which is not an "official policy" and ever if it were, no one would pay attention to it.... Wikipedia 30 words, main point, and then and then and then and then Joanne Rowling CH, OBE, HonFRSE, FRCPE, FRSL (/ˈroʊlɪŋ/ ROH-ling;[1] bo...
- Sun Dec 06, 2020 11:19 pm
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: Fae indeffed on EnWP
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4074
Re: Fae indeffed on EnWP
In case you didn't see it, let me post one of Andreas's old comments from that last Signpost item. Ashley was pushing (relentlessly) to set up the "Wikimedia Chapters Association" as a nonprofit. With himself as the leader. With an annual salary. I profoundly resent the attempted establishment of th...
- Sun Dec 06, 2020 11:15 pm
- Forum: Content Issues
- Topic: Crap or questionable articles
- Replies: 482
- Views: 188543
Re: Crap or questionable articles
Few references here, not searchable under synrm <-the main keyword https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reluctance_motor Because there's no practical way to search for such articles other than to write a VERY complicated script, no one has any idea how many such poorly referenced articles exist on en-wp...
- Sun Dec 06, 2020 8:46 pm
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: Fae indeffed on EnWP
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4074
Re: Fae indeffed on EnWP
Lol, what again? I figured he'd have given up, especially after the immense shit-explosion Ashley created between 2011 and 2013, as a trustee of Wikimedia UK who was also banned from Wikipedia ....have a few reminders, some of which require digging around: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Req...
- Sat Dec 05, 2020 8:29 pm
- Forum: Wikipediocracy talk
- Topic: Vigilant!!!
- Replies: 143
- Views: 86811
Re: Vigilant!!!
That's where my old theory that tarantino was a skip tracer working for a private investigator came from. Now I think he does online security as a job. Chances of this are better than even. As it was since the beginning, Wikiverse is full of "IT professionals", of wildly differing levels of compete...
- Sat Dec 05, 2020 5:42 am
- Forum: Content Issues
- Topic: Crap or questionable articles
- Replies: 482
- Views: 188543
Re: Crap or questionable articles
Here's a thought:
If you are editing any WP article, and some officious jerk starts lecturing you about "references", ask the asshole about this.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bisti/De- ... Wilderness
If you are editing any WP article, and some officious jerk starts lecturing you about "references", ask the asshole about this.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bisti/De- ... Wilderness
- Fri Dec 04, 2020 11:49 pm
- Forum: Content Issues
- Topic: Re: Paid Editing on WP is permissible
- Replies: 341
- Views: 182946
Re: Paid Editing on WP is permissible
Besides the autistic and mentally ill there are lots of low level technology guys who dont fit in anywhere else. There are human robots at wikipedia but no human critical thinking. You got it. Even the editing for pay is often miserable robotic quality. "This damn thing's busted". I saw Laura Kight...