Search found 4059 matches
- Tue Dec 08, 2020 7:42 pm
- Forum: Content Issues
- Topic: Re: Paid Editing on WP is permissible
- Replies: 343
- Views: 185699
Re: Paid Editing on WP is permissible
Why do I keep posting these single instances? They are illustrations of how it's done, especially when it's for an arrogant filthy-rich asshole, who sees paid editing of WP as a "minor business expense". The professionals hide in the endless vast river of autists. https://xtools.wmflabs.org/articlei...
- Mon Dec 07, 2020 10:49 pm
- Forum: WMF staff/contractors and developers
- Topic: K Maher and CFR
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2550
Re: K Maher and CFR
Obviously you received my "parcel". Now you know many things; details even those 12,000 cult members are not aware of. The people who REALLY control the WMF aren't WMF employees, or even paid (at least not by the WMF)--and I'd say there are maybe 600 of them out of the 12,000 with serious control ov...
- Mon Dec 07, 2020 8:09 pm
- Forum: Content Issues
- Topic: Articles Wikipedia should have--but doesn't.
- Replies: 210
- Views: 118457
Re: Articles Wikipedia should have--but doesn't.
There is no article on en-WP about blogger Jack Stuef. He's got to be "notable" by now...... https://www.outsideonline.com/2419429/forrest-fenn-treasure-jack-stuef Over time, those teenage dreams of adventure receded, and Stuef went on to attend Georgetown University, where he served as editor in ch...
- Mon Dec 07, 2020 8:07 pm
- Forum: Content Issues
- Topic: Josh Gordon and eBay
- Replies: 21
- Views: 11465
Re: Josh Gordon and eBay
More than a month later: it's still there. And links to the stalking-scandal article. (Which is included in three categories, but NOT in Category:EBay. Betting $100 that Josh "had a few words" with various people.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EBay#Stalking_scandal
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EBay#Stalking_scandal
- Mon Dec 07, 2020 2:09 am
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: Fae indeffed on EnWP
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4141
Re: Fae indeffed on EnWP
Might as well list the Wikipediocracy thread, even it if is full of Vigina spluttering. http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=38&t=11693 Even funnier: Scott "Scottywong" Wieser, one of Wikipedia's worst administrators of all time, is now on Wikipediocracy shrieking at all and sundry for "o...
- Mon Dec 07, 2020 1:49 am
- Forum: Wikipediocracy talk
- Topic: Vigilant!!!
- Replies: 143
- Views: 87818
Re: Vigilant!!!
Is he finally starting to lose any touch with reality? Watching him complain about Fae is bizarre: pot vs. kettle kind of thing. http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=278547#p278547 hmmmm...... Ashley, my man, you're a radioactive waste ship sailing in international waters. Nobody wants yo...
- Mon Dec 07, 2020 1:25 am
- Forum: Content Issues
- Topic: Crap or questionable articles
- Replies: 484
- Views: 192484
Re: Crap or questionable articles
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:The_Importance_of_Brevity Which is not an "official policy" and ever if it were, no one would pay attention to it.... Wikipedia 30 words, main point, and then and then and then and then Joanne Rowling CH, OBE, HonFRSE, FRCPE, FRSL (/ˈroʊlɪŋ/ ROH-ling;[1] bo...
- Sun Dec 06, 2020 11:19 pm
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: Fae indeffed on EnWP
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4141
Re: Fae indeffed on EnWP
In case you didn't see it, let me post one of Andreas's old comments from that last Signpost item. Ashley was pushing (relentlessly) to set up the "Wikimedia Chapters Association" as a nonprofit. With himself as the leader. With an annual salary. I profoundly resent the attempted establishment of th...
- Sun Dec 06, 2020 11:15 pm
- Forum: Content Issues
- Topic: Crap or questionable articles
- Replies: 484
- Views: 192484
Re: Crap or questionable articles
Few references here, not searchable under synrm <-the main keyword https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reluctance_motor Because there's no practical way to search for such articles other than to write a VERY complicated script, no one has any idea how many such poorly referenced articles exist on en-wp...
- Sun Dec 06, 2020 8:46 pm
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: Fae indeffed on EnWP
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4141
Re: Fae indeffed on EnWP
Lol, what again? I figured he'd have given up, especially after the immense shit-explosion Ashley created between 2011 and 2013, as a trustee of Wikimedia UK who was also banned from Wikipedia ....have a few reminders, some of which require digging around: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Req...