another follow up post. Now they claim they are getting "paid" by a prominent skeptic

http://wikipediawehaveaproblem.com/2017 ... t-skeptic/

Well, Rome I assume you got the book notes I sent? Yes! I emailed you confirming awhile back. Thank you so much for that treasure trove. Making lawsuit threats is even more pointless on RW than it is on Wikipedia. RW has not been very popular anyway, even in scientific-skeptic circles. Too toxic. w...

Hi everyone, To me, there is really not much of a distinction between RationalWiki abuses and Wikipedia abuses, as RW is just an extension of Wikipedia and uses the same software. I know many here know my history with RW, but recently three more cases facing the identical pattern of harassment have ...

ericbarbour wrote:Congrats, Rome. Now you know how "process" is abused. Ultimately you can thank David Gerard for most of this--he's always in the background giggling when someone is defamed on WP or on RW.

.

hmmm, this gave me an idea. PMing you

Hey everyone thanks for the supportive words! I haven't been here in a bit, I'm a bit confused over which boards are still in existence, last time I was here it did not seem very active, now I see all the old faces. let's make some movies, fellas. anyone interested, they can use a new program called...

okay. please don't mistake what I wrote as defending these people, I'm just saying that if we want to communicate to the outside world what the problems are, this type of flag waving may also prevent what you're reporting on to be heard. Signal to noise ratio - shit posting is clogging up the net, t...

Good post! What a dilemma having to make a sock to warn an out of control WP editor like Jytdog. I wonder if he is paid to edit. Funny, I got an email yesterday from someone claiming to be the real Jytdog on Wikipedia, thanking me for the heads up. Of course, was that the real Jytdog, which is just...

This is very very helpful to start! Thanks for this so far. I'm going to dig a bit deeper into what we have so far, will update when more develops.

Hey, Just a thought, and I hope it does not create any grievances towards me for saying this. Why a 'wall of shame'? why 'wikipidiots? Obviously, I am supportive of criticizing Wikipedia, but if we turn this community into toxic dumping, publicly "shaming" people who edit on Wikipedia, the...

Thx Flip. Do you have any idea of how this process happens? Surely it is initiated at the editor or admin level and should be discovered via their histories. I want to see which editor or admin specifically requested WWHP being blacklisted, and the rationale for doing so.