Search found 89 matches

by Guido den Broeder
Sat Sep 21, 2019 10:53 pm
Forum: Wikipedians
Topic: "Fram Gate" in Arbcom
Replies: 203
Views: 66847

Re: "Fram Gate" in Arbcom

Not a chance in hell that I would ever put my case before ArbCom or the community, and I'm sure others feel the same.
by Guido den Broeder
Sat Sep 21, 2019 4:30 pm
Forum: Wikipedians
Topic: How to be a sockpuppeteer
Replies: 41
Views: 24141

Re: How to be a sockpuppeteer

But cookies aren't considered CheckUser data, I'm pretty sure. They're just there so that socks can be prevented. To be exact, it's to prevent block evasion, not socking. If a blocked user logs in, a cookie "enwikiBlock" is set in the browser, and kept after logging out. It blocks editing...
by Guido den Broeder
Sat Sep 21, 2019 4:23 pm
Forum: Wikipedians
Topic: How to be a sockpuppeteer
Replies: 41
Views: 24141

Re: How to be a sockpuppeteer

The checkuser will always work with an IP since only accounts and IP addresses can be checked. Firstly the CU puts the account name into the checkuser tool, and gets a list of IPs and useragents. Then they put the IPs into the CU tool checking each one, getting a list of accounts linked to each. An...
by Guido den Broeder
Fri Sep 20, 2019 12:27 pm
Forum: Wikipedians
Topic: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Fram 2
Replies: 209
Views: 69804

Re: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Fram 2

Fasten your seatbelts, here we go!

Not one iota of understanding why he was banned and desysopped.
by Guido den Broeder
Fri Sep 20, 2019 12:48 am
Forum: Wikipedians
Topic: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Fram 2
Replies: 209
Views: 69804

Re: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Fram 2

I'm kinda surprised. To be honest most people honestly do think he's a dick and probably deserved a ban. They just didnt like how the WMF banned an admin, for one year, on ENWP only. Had they made it site wide infldef, there would have been far less drama. They should blame themself for there lazin...
by Guido den Broeder
Thu Sep 19, 2019 9:56 pm
Forum: Wikipedians
Topic: "Fram Gate" in Arbcom
Replies: 203
Views: 66847

Re: "Fram Gate" in Arbcom

Probably because he isn't sorry at all, he enjoyed harassing me and would do it again. And because it hasn't come up in his ArbCom case, so there was nothing to gain for him by playing to be sorry. He's already in the thick of it again, with his new hobby attacking Wikidata and trying to delete an a...
by Guido den Broeder
Thu Sep 19, 2019 9:23 pm
Forum: Wikipedians
Topic: "Fram Gate" in Arbcom
Replies: 203
Views: 66847

Re: "Fram Gate" in Arbcom

Fram wrote:An aside: sectioned editing on case talk pages causes much more problems than it actually solves. Please abandon it in the future.

Funny then how he was so very much OK with sectioning my comments out of the discussion of his ban proposal for me.

No, he is just saying this to sound important.
by Guido den Broeder
Thu Sep 19, 2019 10:57 am
Forum: Wikipedians
Topic: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Fram 2
Replies: 209
Views: 69804

Re: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Fram 2

The predictions would have been closer to 10%/90%, but most of those 90% have been blocked.
by Guido den Broeder
Wed Sep 18, 2019 2:40 pm
Forum: Wikipedians
Topic: "Fram Gate" in Arbcom
Replies: 203
Views: 66847

Re: "Fram Gate" in Arbcom

If there had been a proper, normal case, with a standard evidence, workshop, and PD phase, where I was allowed to participate in a normal fashion, then I would have no problem accepting the result of "do not pass go, go back to RfA". Tell me, how many blocked/banned user got a chance to &...
by Guido den Broeder
Wed Sep 18, 2019 11:57 am
Forum: Wikipedians
Topic: Anroth
Replies: 4
Views: 2194

Re: Anroth

For Only in death, who describes himself on Wikipedia as 'short-fingered vulgarian', totally appropriate. He either was that guy, or thought of him as a rival who needed to be banned from the workplace.