Search found 89 matches
- Sat Sep 21, 2019 10:53 pm
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: "Fram Gate" in Arbcom
- Replies: 203
- Views: 66847
Re: "Fram Gate" in Arbcom
Not a chance in hell that I would ever put my case before ArbCom or the community, and I'm sure others feel the same.
- Sat Sep 21, 2019 4:30 pm
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: How to be a sockpuppeteer
- Replies: 41
- Views: 24141
Re: How to be a sockpuppeteer
But cookies aren't considered CheckUser data, I'm pretty sure. They're just there so that socks can be prevented. To be exact, it's to prevent block evasion, not socking. If a blocked user logs in, a cookie "enwikiBlock" is set in the browser, and kept after logging out. It blocks editing...
- Sat Sep 21, 2019 4:23 pm
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: How to be a sockpuppeteer
- Replies: 41
- Views: 24141
Re: How to be a sockpuppeteer
The checkuser will always work with an IP since only accounts and IP addresses can be checked. Firstly the CU puts the account name into the checkuser tool, and gets a list of IPs and useragents. Then they put the IPs into the CU tool checking each one, getting a list of accounts linked to each. An...
- Fri Sep 20, 2019 12:27 pm
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Fram 2
- Replies: 209
- Views: 69804
- Fri Sep 20, 2019 12:48 am
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Fram 2
- Replies: 209
- Views: 69804
Re: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Fram 2
I'm kinda surprised. To be honest most people honestly do think he's a dick and probably deserved a ban. They just didnt like how the WMF banned an admin, for one year, on ENWP only. Had they made it site wide infldef, there would have been far less drama. They should blame themself for there lazin...
- Thu Sep 19, 2019 9:56 pm
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: "Fram Gate" in Arbcom
- Replies: 203
- Views: 66847
Re: "Fram Gate" in Arbcom
Probably because he isn't sorry at all, he enjoyed harassing me and would do it again. And because it hasn't come up in his ArbCom case, so there was nothing to gain for him by playing to be sorry. He's already in the thick of it again, with his new hobby attacking Wikidata and trying to delete an a...
- Thu Sep 19, 2019 9:23 pm
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: "Fram Gate" in Arbcom
- Replies: 203
- Views: 66847
Re: "Fram Gate" in Arbcom
Fram wrote:An aside: sectioned editing on case talk pages causes much more problems than it actually solves. Please abandon it in the future.
Funny then how he was so very much OK with sectioning my comments out of the discussion of his ban proposal for me.
No, he is just saying this to sound important.
- Thu Sep 19, 2019 10:57 am
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Fram 2
- Replies: 209
- Views: 69804
Re: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Fram 2
The predictions would have been closer to 10%/90%, but most of those 90% have been blocked.
- Wed Sep 18, 2019 2:40 pm
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: "Fram Gate" in Arbcom
- Replies: 203
- Views: 66847
Re: "Fram Gate" in Arbcom
If there had been a proper, normal case, with a standard evidence, workshop, and PD phase, where I was allowed to participate in a normal fashion, then I would have no problem accepting the result of "do not pass go, go back to RfA". Tell me, how many blocked/banned user got a chance to &...
- Wed Sep 18, 2019 11:57 am
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: Anroth
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2194
Re: Anroth
For Only in death, who describes himself on Wikipedia as 'short-fingered vulgarian', totally appropriate. He either was that guy, or thought of him as a rival who needed to be banned from the workplace.