Search found 70 matches
- Sun Aug 07, 2022 9:18 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: This surveillance should not be legal!
- Replies: 3
- Views: 811
Re: This surveillance should not be legal!
The only edit I have made so far after scrambling my password and removing my email (I have disclosed myself): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:C ... 8:209C:DB3
- Thu Aug 04, 2022 10:58 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: This surveillance should not be legal!
- Replies: 3
- Views: 811
Re: This surveillance should not be legal!
Either give it up (FAR better), or get a VPN and use it. I've already warned you they go around blocking VPN and TOR gateways from editing, but perhaps you can figure out something. Lotsa luck and don't try it anyway! I will just leave. The tracking is not worth staying. I need to find out how to n...
- Thu Aug 04, 2022 2:27 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: This surveillance should not be legal!
- Replies: 3
- Views: 811
This surveillance should not be legal!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Yleventa2#Log%20in Ironic that Wikipedia bans people for "not contributing to the encyclopedia", when tracking users and obsessing over rules is clearly unencylopedic... I have unusual views on some topics, but this is still top much. The only way I can win is...
- Wed Aug 03, 2022 4:37 pm
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: Lugnuts
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1980
Re: Lugnuts
I see, I completely forgot you. My apologies
- Tue Aug 02, 2022 7:25 pm
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: Lugnuts
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1980
Re: Lugnuts
Adding to the list of banned power users Lugnuts, Rich Farmbrough, Koavf, John Pack Lambert, Aussie Article Writer... I think Wikipedia is planning to shut down soon, thankfully.
- Thu Jul 28, 2022 4:00 pm
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: John Pack Lambert
- Replies: 11
- Views: 2528
Re: John Pack Lambert
He will soon be prohibited from nominating articles for deletion: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct_in_deletion-related_editing/Proposed_decision&oldid=1100962615#Johnpacklambert_topic_banned I don't fully blame him, Wikipedia can easily mess with...
- Tue Jun 21, 2022 3:25 pm
- Forum: Content Issues
- Topic: Apparently, anyone can request an article deleted by PROD to be undeleted for any reason
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1285
Re: Apparently, anyone can request an article deleted by PROD to be undeleted for any reason
The article is finally deleted. This took way too much time though. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autistic_ ... ry_Network
- Sun Jun 19, 2022 2:27 pm
- Forum: Content Issues
- Topic: Apparently, anyone can request an article deleted by PROD to be undeleted for any reason
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1285
Re: Apparently, anyone can request an article deleted by PROD to be undeleted for any reason
Delete per nom. Shouldn't have been undeleted after the prod. A complete waste of everybodies time. (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FAutistic_Women_%26_Nonbinary_Network&type=revision&diff=1093794991&oldid=1093489325) At least this highly experienced u...
- Mon Jun 13, 2022 12:08 am
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: Why admins were destined to fail from the beginning
- Replies: 2
- Views: 888
Re: Why admins were destined to fail from the beginning
Thanks, that is definitely a good point though
- Mon Jun 13, 2022 12:07 am
- Forum: Content Issues
- Topic: Apparently, anyone can request an article deleted by PROD to be undeleted for any reason
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1285
Re: Apparently, anyone can request an article deleted by PROD to be undeleted for any reason
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#Contested_proposed_deletions_should_require_enough_solid_evidence_to_back_up_reasons I am surprised at how much debate this has caused! And I am not. PROD is one of their most idiotic creations. Few of their "policies" have been abused m...