I know a lot of people think NYB is a great arb but he's not. He's a two faced hypocrite who thinks the rules on Wikipedia donl jot and should not apply to him. He hasn't done anything at all to improve wikipedia for literally years. He just sits on arbcom and pontificate. He's worthless! With insi...

A vote for Laser Brain is a vote for this prick..... m ....although the fun thing about this election is he isn't really hiding who he is in his candidate statement. The real architect of that mess is NewYorkBrad, and his candidate statement and answers of course give absolutely no hint of that lame...

With people on this board ridiculously only just bothering to read up on the Corbett, I thought I'd check in and review what I'd missed in the last few weeks while Princess Mod and the fun time crew were being royal pains in the asses to serious critics, distracting from serious work like this. Turn...

Do you understand the difference between getting stoned and expressing the view "I think marijuana should be legal"??? Do you understand the difference between committing a crime, soliciting a crime to be committed, and advocating for a change in the law? Here is the difference....1. Ille...

it is usefully (with appropriate caution) for quickly looking up basic core facts The appropriate caution required for Wikipedia is such that you are always better off simply not even looking at Wikipedia. Well, that calls for just one single example to disprove: Is there a faster and significantly...

Garbage thread is garbage. Ridiculous Kumioko didn't even notice he was banned, since he was around both critic forums when Eric was reinventing himself as a supposed critic and fellow socky-wocky-warrior. Early indications are his clandestine efforts will be just as effective in bringing down the W...

Carrite, just stop. I'm embarrassed for you. Why not try an easier task, reputation management wise. For example, explaining how Beeblehrox isn't just flat out lying here in this answer...... I'm always careful not to say anything [on Wikipediocracy] that would violate the access to nonpublic inform...

The appropriate caution required for Wikipedia is such that you are always better off simply not even looking at Wikipedia. Generalizing is just silly. There are a lot of valuable and reliable articles (mostly in non-contentious areas, such as mathematics). What's silly is saying dumb things like t...

JuiceBeetle wrote:

CrowsNest wrote:Because I could have sworn 15<19.

15 is still more than 11, so you're laughing at yourself. Don't be pathetic.

Don't defend two faced asswipes.

Two last minute candidates DGG and Enterprisey means only one thing. There is only one woman standing. And she is standing for re-election. So whatever else happens, one thing that is definitely taking a nose-dive this year, is Wikipedia's ability to say they care about gender equality. At most, the...