Looks like the overconfident pikie on sucks was wrong again.
If you meant pikey, that's a poorly chosen insult, they're known for being brash, and for having the stones to back it up. Just like me.
But anyway, about that. Are things genuinely so hard up for you that you need to implicitly trust the word of a clearly emotionally unstable and deeply traumatized Wikipedia Administrator over a serious and credible critic? Let's say Ritchie is the RAT, what possible reason would he have for a tell all confession to Fram at this moment in time? He's at the height of his sympathy bid. In an instant, he would become Wikipedia's most hated user.
All I can think of, would be as part of a last gasp unburdening of his soul, before he downed that bottle of pills. And unlike yourself and your recently chastised butt, I'm not willing to have the guy top himself just so I can be proven right.
As usual though, you're not thinking clearly yourself. You're not asking, what would this guy, this man who insists he is a sensitive guy who is deeply attuned to the suffering of women, this guy who so vocally and so persistently dragged Fram's name through the mud, what would he have actually done if faced with the fact nobody was listening to him on Wikipedia, but who perhaps found out about Fram's history with Hale, how it ties in with what he saw him do to Elisa, and a few of his other WiR friends, what would he have done about this aggressive Administrator harassing women for no better reason than they don't meet his exacting standards, really?
I mean, you get how Ritchie reacts to nobody listening to him, right? You're seeing how he reacts to anyone he thinks isn't treating good faith rubes the right way, right? You're seeing that it doesn't exactly put him on the straight and level, right? Doesn't turn him into a pillar of forward thinking or rational acting, right?
To spell it out, because I kinda think I have to, these are the exact conditions that we know turns Ritchie into a bit of an impulsive madman. A bit of a fuck 'em I'll show them all maverick. A loner. A lone gunman, even. I appreciate you're hamstrung by your intrinsic lack of knowledge of the really bad actors on Wikipedia of the last few years or so, but trust me on this at least, because it's observable fact, seen on many different occasions. Check our records.
So sure, he says to Fram he wouldn't have been bothered enough to fire off an email. This
guy. The guy who gets so fucking angry at Trump and Brexit he spends hours doing dumb shit on Wikipedia making cartoons and pithy jokes and uploading copyright violations, this guy says he wouldn't have bothered sending an email about that sort of issue?
Fuck him, and fuck you for either being so gullible to mindlessly act as his advocate because you genuinely believe him, or for being so desperate to claw back some of your totally destroyed reputation that you'd say any old shit to find some way to discredit me. Beyond embarrassing.
You surely know by now you can't come at me with this half baked crap. You probably can't do me with anything, but I'd advise you to at least pick a subject that you know well. We pikeys, we fight bare knuckle style. You don't even so much as look at me boy, unless you brought your good chains. That's jewellery btw, not bondage. I see how you like posting pictures of Fae.