Re: Paddo Vigilant wrote again something.
Posted: Wed May 01, 2019 7:21 pm
Poet wrote:You never know. The judge might take pity on him.
This is really cynical.
Indeed you never know.
BADSITEBADSITEBADSITE
https://www.wikipediasucks.co/forum/
https://www.wikipediasucks.co/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=1307
Poet wrote:You never know. The judge might take pity on him.
Beeblebrox wrote:I don't know why you bother arguing with that nutbag. Do you also enjoy hitting brick walls with your head?
complain
Mister Jimbo, they called me a Troll on Dutch wikipedia. They blocked me twice, indefinitely , ok, the first time they were right because I had over 15 sockpuppets, and the other blocks were only a for shorter time. A TROLL ,THEY CALLED ME! DO YO HERE ME? A TROLL!!! What kind of organisation is this? They also blocked me on Wikimedia_Be because I called someone a Monkey. Only once. And on Dutch Wikimedia because I asked a few questions. YOU ARE A TROLL!!!! Graaf Statler (talk) 09:59, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Somey wrote: don't think that's him - looks like a joe-job to me. Not enough spelling mistakes.
Obviously, I could be wrong...
Mister Jimbo.........YOU ARE A TROLL!!!! Graaf Statler (talk) 09:59
I don't know why this is the only science related comment to be seen on Wikipediocracy right now.Vigilant wrote:I view it more as increasing the power on a cyclotron to see what fundamental particles can be derived.Beeblebrox wrote:I don't know why you bother arguing with that nutbag. Do you also enjoy hitting brick walls with your head?
It's science!
Statler: It was your fucking trolbot program what made this Lomax and me blunders, wasn't it?
Vig: No, son.
Midsize Jake wrote:
I don't think that's him - looks like a joe-job to me. Not enough spelling mistakes.
Obviously, I could be wrong...
Randy:
Exacte!