WO is going to start over with staff

For serious discussion of the "major" forum for Wikipedia criticism and how it fails.
Post Reply
User avatar
Flip Flopped
Sucks Warrior
Posts: 564
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2017 3:38 am
Been thanked: 1 time

WO is going to start over with staff

Post by Flip Flopped » Wed Jun 28, 2017 2:43 am

Sounds like Vigilant will be a Trustee. Barbour was mentioned as someone Zoloft misses there, but I don't know if he and Vigilant can get along.

I notice there isn't even an aspiration to not allow staff to conspire in doxxing, joe-jobbing, tromboning, etc. the participants of the forum. That's pretty bad and creepy.

User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 4671
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Location: The ass-tral plane
Has thanked: 1180 times
Been thanked: 1876 times

Re: WO is going to start over with staff

Post by ericbarbour » Tue Jul 04, 2017 8:29 pm

Flip Flopped wrote:Sounds like Vigilant will be a Trustee. Barbour was mentioned as someone Zoloft misses there, but I don't know if he and Vigilant can get along.

We don't. And if they make Vig a sysop, things will REALLY get bad.

I notice there isn't even an aspiration to not allow staff to conspire in doxxing, joe-jobbing, tromboning, etc. the participants of the forum. That's pretty bad and creepy.

They do it only when it "serves their purposes". Which seem more about seizing control of en-WP than anything else. "Wikipedia criticism" isn't even in the target zone anymore. Think of WO as a really badly-run pirate ship. Haha.

Post Reply