Vigilant!!!

For serious discussion of the "major" forum for Wikipedia criticism and how it fails.
User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 4547
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Location: The ass-tral plane
Has thanked: 1099 times
Been thanked: 1797 times

Re: Vigilant!!!

Post by ericbarbour » Sat Dec 05, 2020 8:29 pm

Strelnikov wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 2:30 am
That's where my old theory that tarantino was a skip tracer working for a private investigator came from. Now I think he does online security as a job.
Chances of this are better than even. As it was since the beginning, Wikiverse is full of "IT professionals", of wildly differing levels of competence. And sanity. Thus the oversupply of bot programmers and patrollers.

User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 4547
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Location: The ass-tral plane
Has thanked: 1099 times
Been thanked: 1797 times

Re: Vigilant!!!

Post by ericbarbour » Mon Dec 07, 2020 1:49 am

Is he finally starting to lose any touch with reality? Watching him complain about Fae is bizarre: pot vs. kettle kind of thing.

http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtop ... 47#p278547

hmmmm......
Ashley, my man, you're a radioactive waste ship sailing in international waters.

Nobody wants you docking with them.
Foreskin envy?.....

User avatar
NIDA
Sucks Fan
Posts: 136
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2021 4:41 pm

Re: Vigilant!!!

Post by NIDA » Mon Apr 26, 2021 2:16 am


User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 4547
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Location: The ass-tral plane
Has thanked: 1099 times
Been thanked: 1797 times

Re: Vigilant!!!

Post by ericbarbour » Sun Jun 25, 2023 5:09 am

Has anyone run across a RECENT example of Vig saying something not-stupid or maybe-amusing?

Because I have a feeling he's "phoning it in" these days.

Post Reply