What's going on at WPU now?

For serious discussion of the "major" forum for Wikipedia criticism and how it fails.
Post Reply
User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 2150
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 269 times

What's going on at WPU now?

Post by ericbarbour » Sun Sep 27, 2020 5:03 am

It is looking rather boring and slow right now. Anyone got news?

User avatar
Dr Mario
Sucks Noob
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2020 12:54 pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: What's going on at WPU now?

Post by Dr Mario » Sat Oct 10, 2020 1:21 pm

On the front page there hasn't been an new article since january 7, 2020, thats some 9 nine months but I would like think that website thats supposed to be critical of wikipedia should have more activity than that. However there is some activity WPU's forum so I would guess that for most part that website is dying appart from its forum. So would anyone be shocked if WPU would retreat to forum only format at some point ?

User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 2150
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 269 times

Re: What's going on at WPU now?

Post by ericbarbour » Tue Oct 13, 2020 8:01 am

I was one of the original admins (until they forced me out in 2015). Until then the "blog" was somewhat routinely updated with new essays, some being important parts of Wikipedia history, like the Quorty story or a couple of "outings" of anonymous people. The blog is important and it SHOULD be preserved -- but there doesn't seem to be much interest anymore.

Most of the traffic on the forum (which is a fraction of what it was in 2014) consists of people like Poetguy, a few admins, Kumioko (when he's not banned), Eric Corbett (when he's not banned), Somey, Wee Billy, and a few others talking about trivia. And occasional fart-splosions from Vigilant. As I've said before, this is NOT Wikipedia criticism, it is mostly fanboyism. Wikipedia is now evidently "above criticism of any kind" or something. Just as secretive and fucked up and insane as before, actually in some ways it's far sicker than it was ten years ago (deletionist patrollers completely control it now). But very few people want to discuss it seriously.

User avatar
Strelnikov
Sucks Admin
Posts: 731
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 11:25 pm
Has thanked: 134 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: What's going on at WPU now?

Post by Strelnikov » Tue Oct 13, 2020 8:03 am

Dr Mario wrote:
Sat Oct 10, 2020 1:21 pm
On the front page there hasn't been an new article since j\January 7, 2020, that's some 9 nine months but I would like think that website that's supposed to be critical of Wikipedia should have more activity than that. However there is some activity WPU's forum so I would guess that for most part that website is dying apart from its forum. So would anyone be shocked if WPU would retreat to forum-only format at some point ?
None of the surviving members of Wikipediocracy are journalist-y types; they like to complain about how badly en.Wikipedia is running on a forum, but they aren't going to start a blog or email chain or pdf newsletter. They need a writer, they won't get one. It's already a forum with a dead blog.
Still "Globally Banned" on Wikipedia for the high crime of journalism.

User avatar
Eric Corbett
Sucks
Posts: 18
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2020 12:47 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: What's going on at WPU now?

Post by Eric Corbett » Tue Oct 13, 2020 6:56 pm

ericbarbour wrote:
Tue Oct 13, 2020 8:01 am
Most of the traffic on the forum (which is a fraction of what it was in 2014) consists of people like Poetguy, a few admins, Kumioko (when he's not banned), Eric Corbett (when he's not banned), Somey, Wee Billy, and a few others talking about trivia. And occasional fart-splosions from Vigilant. As I've said before, this is NOT Wikipedia criticism, it is mostly fanboyism. Wikipedia is now evidently "above criticism of any kind" or something. Just as secretive and fucked up and insane as before, actually in some ways it's far sicker than it was ten years ago (deletionist patrollers completely control it now). But very few people want to discuss it seriously.
I don't think that's entirely right. I was never a welcome visitor at Wikipediocracy, and it always seemed to me that Poetlister kept the whole thing active. Why he does that in the face of a constant onslaught from the egregious Vigilant god alone knows. If they banned Vigilant they might be able to recruit a few more members, but they won't.

For me, Wikipediocracy and other similar sites, including this one in the past, are nothing to do with WP criticism at all, just a forum for slagging off unpopular editors without right of reply.

User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 2150
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 269 times

Re: What's going on at WPU now?

Post by ericbarbour » Wed Oct 14, 2020 9:44 am

Eric Corbett wrote:
Tue Oct 13, 2020 6:56 pm
I don't think that's entirely right. I was never a welcome visitor at Wikipediocracy
Very few people are. Anyone who has at least 10,000 edits or an admin bit will be "welcomed"--unless they say things Wee Billy and his friends don't like to hear. Quite a few "troublemakers" have been kicked out since the 2015-16 coup. Before that you had to really be overbearing to be banned, like Wikipedia Review before it.
For me, Wikipediocracy and other similar sites, including this one in the past, are nothing to do with WP criticism at all, just a forum for slagging off unpopular editors without right of reply.
No argument from me. I keep this forum going mostly as a public place to drop bad content and any atrocities we hear about. Plenty more is covered up or hidden anyway. This forum is really NOT that important, but then let's be honest, no website criticizing WP's inside crowd ever was. WPers have TOTAL contempt for anyone who objects to the way they operate their sick little private server farm/encyclo-thing.

Wikipediocracy started for similar reasons to this forum but is now more of a gossip rag for Wiki addicts. They embarrass themselves every day now. And won't admit as much.

User avatar
Kumioko
Sucks Mod
Posts: 722
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2017 11:54 pm
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 42 times

Re: What's going on at WPU now?

Post by Kumioko » Thu Oct 15, 2020 9:59 am

Yeah WPO has been pretty dead for a while. Part of the blame falls on zoloft for driving out all the critics and making it into another forum for wikipedia admins to justify the toxic and abusive conduct on wikipedia. Characters like Beeblebrox, serial shit heads like vagilint, etc. Its really gone downhill.

And im pretty much permabanned because zoloft prefers to have admins post there than me or most other critics. Quite a few won't post with me able to post because I hurt their little feelings.
#BbbGate

User avatar
Dr Mario
Sucks Noob
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2020 12:54 pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: What's going on at WPU now?

Post by Dr Mario » Tue Oct 27, 2020 7:07 pm

ericbarbour wrote:
Wed Oct 14, 2020 9:44 am
Eric Corbett wrote:
Tue Oct 13, 2020 6:56 pm
I don't think that's entirely right. I was never a welcome visitor at Wikipediocracy
Very few people are. Anyone who has at least 10,000 edits or an admin bit will be "welcomed"--unless they say things Wee Billy and his friends don't like to hear. Quite a few "troublemakers" have been kicked out since the 2015-16 coup. Before that you had to really be overbearing to be banned, like Wikipedia Review before it.
For me, Wikipediocracy and other similar sites, including this one in the past, are nothing to do with WP criticism at all, just a forum for slagging off unpopular editors without right of reply.
No argument from me. I keep this forum going mostly as a public place to drop bad content and any atrocities we hear about. Plenty more is covered up or hidden anyway. This forum is really NOT that important, but then let's be honest, no website criticizing WP's inside crowd ever was. WPers have TOTAL contempt for anyone who objects to the way they operate their sick little private server farm/encyclo-thing.

Wikipediocracy started for similar reasons to this forum but is now more of a gossip rag for Wiki addicts. They embarrass themselves every day now. And won't admit as much.
considering the part I bolded and underlined, And here is simple little truth on wikipedia itself the web "encyclopedia's" internal and external issues are not the most pressing social issue at alarge. When we are still having povetry, world hunger, wars and pandemic on going.

Post Reply