ericbarbour wrote: ↑Wed Dec 08, 2021 2:11 am
It seems that "winning", for you, consists of starting between 5 and 10 new threads on this forum per week. With loads of repetition and hammering on certain subjects.
I'll only let you do this as long as you occasionally post something involving WP process abuse of a significant nature. Twats waffling at each other on AN/I does not count. Jake, Tarantino, Zoloft and Vigina ranting uselessly on WPO does not count. We KNOW they are compromised, and they are just a bloody forum anyway. A "criticism forum" that lacks any teeth in its criticism.
I like to see the BIG explosions and the mass-media-involved scandals. Things like the Eostrix RFA from last month for example. Even WPO has internal scandals, pathetic as they usually are.
SO FIND SOME DAMMIT.
I don't think think you have the first clue regarding the significance of some of the stuff I track and document here. The press are interested in pretty much all the stuff I document.
It's even quite possible my note of Eostrix's curious duality, dancing an odd line between high morals and wanting to appear to be the perfect little RfA candidate, that is what got him on Beeblebrox's radar.
Without me paying close attention to shit that needs paying close attention to, that you apparently don't understand because you don't care to read it properly, you might not have even got that scandal. He would have just sailed through RfA and quietly set about his business, undetected.
I think you actually have me confused with those prats at Wikipediocracy, who for all their (long forgotten!) objections to "inside baseball", that is all they do, because of who they are and who they are trying to influence. Even their blog posts nowadays, are by insiders, for insiders. Oh, the irony. Easily demolished by people who are in this for the right reasons.
That's the shit they want to get into the media. Without me around to rip it to shreds, in this case before they had even got it up, the only stuff you might have to comment on, scandal wise, is their fucking bullshit.
I'm not here to do your bidding Eric. If you want Wikipedia destroyed, particularly if you want the propelry informed media's help to do so, just sit back and let me do my thing. Or not. Doesn't make a blind bit of difference to me. Despite what others may think, this is not my life's work. If I cared that much, I would go meat space on their asses.
You need people like me here Eric, otherwise who is going to tell you that drama explosions are getting less frequent, and the reasons why. You can't do this shit from across the street Eric. Some of your replies to my stuff are cringeworthy in how out of date and how out of touch you are with Wikipedia of 2021.
For all that they are playing for completely the wrong team and have taken selling out to epic new levels, credit to Tarantino and company for probably knowing exactly what I know about Wikipedia of the present day (and trying to do everything they can to stop me exposing it!).
I let it lie, your less than helpful contributions, because I'm a nice guy.
Don't piss me off.