https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... Principles
Joe is goin' to have his porky little ass arbitrated.
And some of the "arbitration" will happen on Wikipediocracy, because lol.
https://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewto ... &start=350
People are pointing out MORE dirty tricks Joe has pulled over the past 16 years. And Crow is getting wound up yet again.....
They STILL miss the point: how many other administrators/insiders are abusing COI like this? No doubt there are others, still undiscovered.
Wanna see even more stupid babbling and fighting?
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... over_crats
EAT SHIT, Ira.There is no serious doubt that ArbCom already has this authority, so the amendment is not necessary, and therefore this is not a good use of the community's time. Newyorkbrad (talk) 02:08, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
EAT SHIT, Brad. "Moot point" or not, bureaucrat powers have been abused CONSTANTLY since they were created, and usually the abusers got away with it for years. Arbcom only deals with it when they aren't being a bunch of chickenshit cowards."Adminstrative" tools is a wider power grant than "administrator and bureaucrat"; for instance the committee would be (and has) within their power to prohibit someone from using rollback, or from using edit filter manager abilities, etc. No one is seriously questioning the ability of Arbcom to de-crat if they decide it necessary, after all, but with this passed the question of "could Arbcom order EFM removed" becomes an open question, and right now it is really not -- yes, they can. Courcelles (talk) 14:20, 6 March 2024 (UTC)