Kraken banned by Zoloft
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2024 12:16 pm
So after 542 posts and nearly three months, Zoloft reverted to type and placed a no warning ban for this post, calling me a "numptie" and saying "I do not think he'll be much missed." His house boy Vigilant immediately chimed in with "And nothing of value was lost."
In one way I agree with Vigilant. I didn't see the point of a tiny minority of shitheels being allowed to constantly provoke me with the most vile of abuse, calling me everything from a pedophile, lunatic, incel and fascist. So that will stop. Also their almost constant whining at my mere presence.
Honestly, what a bunch of absolute babies. In one exchange with Anroth, who I embarrassed years ago, I swear to God, he was indistinguishable from an 8 year old. Every, single word, over multiple replies. He just can't deal basic facts. Extreme snowflakery. Even for Wikipediocracy, it was epic mod fail. And to think, at one stage journalists used to cite Wikipediocracy. Not any more. This is why. It's beyond embarrassing.
I got no credit from Zoloft for never rising to the bait. Even though I think everyone knows I can make mincemeat of the likes of Vigilant with little effort in a fair fight. I can start it even now. Look Vigilant, I'm back at Sucks. They don't hate me. You should check your facts before you open your trap, boy.
My stay definitely seemed to prove Giraffe Stapler is a previous victim of mine. He says literally anything in an attempt to attack me. He says I hate women, for example. He can't prove it. But every time you disprove an accusation with the facts, he just changes the accusation. He'd probably just keep doing that forever. Observable reality means nothing to the man.
I think I must have properly wounded him to make him exit the observable universe, no? Hard to feel too bad when he won't say who he is. But it's definitely personal. I'm thinking he properly deserved it. He probably said something insanely false, and doubled down when called on it, then refused one last opportunity, taking me and everyone watching for fools. So I probably let rip. My No. 1 fan was born!
This constant stream of unjustified abuse was a decidedly odd look for a forum whose main backer/banner Zoloft says they he is even more to the left than Katherine Maher. It could perhaps even earn Zoloft his own ban from attending Wikimedia Foundation events, something he seems to relish.
On the other hand, the idea I won't be missed isn't exactly true. There must have been quite the power struggle between their only two Admins (if Zoloft even let Jake have a say) because I was such a valued poster Jake was singing the praises of my apparently Blog worthy post here. It's a feminist topic. So it doesn't exist in the Giraffe universe. Poor guy. Properly broken. Perhaps it could be my epitaph? Or perhaps they hate me more than they claim to be feminists.
Something I would like answered.....why was this post locked on my banning? Spite? One last expression of sheer jealousy at how easy I find it to be an effective Wikipedia critic even as an assortment of little doggies try to hump my leg?
It wasn't all bad. I had other interested readers. My random article game is providing fun for all the family. Except Vigilant. And that was by design. I was trying to think of a topic that would make a serious point about Wikipedia, engage everyone, but in a way that couldn't be ruined by Vigilant. It seems to have worked.
I don't know why they keep Vigilant, much less stroke his ego by naming him their "#1" poster during the outing controversy over GeneralNotability. If ever there was a sign of Zoloft's mismanagement, it's that. Vigilant had made a huge mistake, setting back the forum years, and they backed him on principle. The fear of change is palpable. Precisely because I am smarter than most people, especially Vigilant, I found it quite easy to demonstrate that in that specific instance, not only had Vigilant not upheld the principle, he had undermined it. To me, analysing this stuff is as easy as breathing. My talent I guess. And years of experience with Wikipedia.
But talent breeds jealousy. Jealousy breeds hate. Such is life. I'm not sure he's ever going to live down that embarrassment. How hard he dug his heels in. How overwhelming the pushback. How damaging the act. The forum was by then being openly quoted on Wikipedia. Not just being linked, but seen as a companion guide to controversies. It was having a direct impact. Right on the back of the Nihonjoe case. A justified outing. A good outing. A principled outing.
Overnight, that changed. All because Vigilant couldn't handle being overshadowed, sidelined, considered an archaic remnant of a previous age. They're backsliding to Peak Vigilant. He and fun, but they were irrelevant. I could have been a part of the change. Now I guess we just have wait for Zoloft to die. Then their Base Will Belong.
Anyway, until that great day, its good to be back on a forum with a stable web host. Evidently they need cash to be certain of staying online. I doubt anyone will want to donate to them on this evidence. Funding Hamas might create less hate than Zoloft and his creche.
In one way I agree with Vigilant. I didn't see the point of a tiny minority of shitheels being allowed to constantly provoke me with the most vile of abuse, calling me everything from a pedophile, lunatic, incel and fascist. So that will stop. Also their almost constant whining at my mere presence.
Honestly, what a bunch of absolute babies. In one exchange with Anroth, who I embarrassed years ago, I swear to God, he was indistinguishable from an 8 year old. Every, single word, over multiple replies. He just can't deal basic facts. Extreme snowflakery. Even for Wikipediocracy, it was epic mod fail. And to think, at one stage journalists used to cite Wikipediocracy. Not any more. This is why. It's beyond embarrassing.
I got no credit from Zoloft for never rising to the bait. Even though I think everyone knows I can make mincemeat of the likes of Vigilant with little effort in a fair fight. I can start it even now. Look Vigilant, I'm back at Sucks. They don't hate me. You should check your facts before you open your trap, boy.
My stay definitely seemed to prove Giraffe Stapler is a previous victim of mine. He says literally anything in an attempt to attack me. He says I hate women, for example. He can't prove it. But every time you disprove an accusation with the facts, he just changes the accusation. He'd probably just keep doing that forever. Observable reality means nothing to the man.
I think I must have properly wounded him to make him exit the observable universe, no? Hard to feel too bad when he won't say who he is. But it's definitely personal. I'm thinking he properly deserved it. He probably said something insanely false, and doubled down when called on it, then refused one last opportunity, taking me and everyone watching for fools. So I probably let rip. My No. 1 fan was born!
This constant stream of unjustified abuse was a decidedly odd look for a forum whose main backer/banner Zoloft says they he is even more to the left than Katherine Maher. It could perhaps even earn Zoloft his own ban from attending Wikimedia Foundation events, something he seems to relish.
On the other hand, the idea I won't be missed isn't exactly true. There must have been quite the power struggle between their only two Admins (if Zoloft even let Jake have a say) because I was such a valued poster Jake was singing the praises of my apparently Blog worthy post here. It's a feminist topic. So it doesn't exist in the Giraffe universe. Poor guy. Properly broken. Perhaps it could be my epitaph? Or perhaps they hate me more than they claim to be feminists.
Something I would like answered.....why was this post locked on my banning? Spite? One last expression of sheer jealousy at how easy I find it to be an effective Wikipedia critic even as an assortment of little doggies try to hump my leg?
It wasn't all bad. I had other interested readers. My random article game is providing fun for all the family. Except Vigilant. And that was by design. I was trying to think of a topic that would make a serious point about Wikipedia, engage everyone, but in a way that couldn't be ruined by Vigilant. It seems to have worked.
I don't know why they keep Vigilant, much less stroke his ego by naming him their "#1" poster during the outing controversy over GeneralNotability. If ever there was a sign of Zoloft's mismanagement, it's that. Vigilant had made a huge mistake, setting back the forum years, and they backed him on principle. The fear of change is palpable. Precisely because I am smarter than most people, especially Vigilant, I found it quite easy to demonstrate that in that specific instance, not only had Vigilant not upheld the principle, he had undermined it. To me, analysing this stuff is as easy as breathing. My talent I guess. And years of experience with Wikipedia.
But talent breeds jealousy. Jealousy breeds hate. Such is life. I'm not sure he's ever going to live down that embarrassment. How hard he dug his heels in. How overwhelming the pushback. How damaging the act. The forum was by then being openly quoted on Wikipedia. Not just being linked, but seen as a companion guide to controversies. It was having a direct impact. Right on the back of the Nihonjoe case. A justified outing. A good outing. A principled outing.
Overnight, that changed. All because Vigilant couldn't handle being overshadowed, sidelined, considered an archaic remnant of a previous age. They're backsliding to Peak Vigilant. He and fun, but they were irrelevant. I could have been a part of the change. Now I guess we just have wait for Zoloft to die. Then their Base Will Belong.
Anyway, until that great day, its good to be back on a forum with a stable web host. Evidently they need cash to be certain of staying online. I doubt anyone will want to donate to them on this evidence. Funding Hamas might create less hate than Zoloft and his creche.