Don't worry Graf, the post doesn't make much sense in English either.
He explains it more clearly here....
some sort of extreme anti-Wikipedia orthodoxy, which would be completely justifiable in an ideological sense, but (as I stated earlier) would probably result in the site becoming first a shit-fling, then an echo chamber, then a ghost town
He's basically admitting he is happy to sacrifice the idea his site exists to criticise Wikipedia, expose their truth, in exchange for ensuring people want to post.
He's steadfastly refusing to admit a few obvious issues. The site currently
is an echo-chamber, the predominant vibe being Wikipedia is largely OK, a net benefit to society which just needs a few tweaks here and there, and the fault for all that ails it largely rests with the WMF and/or the evil Administrator cabal. And it
is already the case that people who diverge from this orthodoxy both have shit flung at them and are subject to Wikipedian style tactics to evade/avoid/attack. Which is unsurprising, since the only people who really subscribe to this orthodoxy, are Wikipediots themselves.
This is the reason serious critics who have different ideas or are harder in their views have all left. You frankly can't have any kind of serious discussion with people who are so delusional and so precious. They will always perceive attempts to discuss, especially if it is to disagree, as trolling or insults. You can't discuss anything at all with people who, when given the choice by the management to simply not respond if doing so makes them look silly or worse, choose not to respond.
He seems to think what he already has on his site is actual discussion, not a hegemony, or an often quite sad parody of what passes for debate or analysis in wikiland. The sad fact is, he's not dumb, there's been many times he has admitted himself what goes on there, the low rent tactics of his favoured posters. For some reason, he seems to believe people like me are begging to be ignored, insulted, misrepresented and generally taken for fools, as the price of entry.
This hemegony is also why Zoloft will never get his wish and see any of his mates from Wikimania dropping by for cosy fireside chats. Those people are not interested because they see the site as being just for disgruntled Wikipedians with questionable views who are otherwise still quite happily seeing themselves as part of the 'movement', even if experiencing the temporary inconvenience of a block. They are safely ignored outside the wiki by the True Believers, just as they are safely ignored inside.
He's also forgetting the most pertinent point - I never actually flung shit at anyone, I abided by their rules as best I could, despite this being very difficult for any normal person to do. He seems to forget, being a Wikipedian, having their mindset of what is right and acceptable, is not normal. Any time I can think of where I supposedly behaved badly, were eclipsed, regularly, by the behaviour of those he apparently values more.
I have absolutely no problem being asked to do whatever is necessary to ensure a wide range of opinions are seen as welcome on a discussion site. That is what debate is. As long as it actually results in discussion, and not in people like me people with talent and skills and knowledge, being taken for a fools.
Jake just needs to just sit down and think. Why are the people he apparently values more than me, actually visiting his site? Is it really to discuss or debate? Are they, as a collective, really fulfilling their mission? Or is their mission now just to look moderately active, and screw the 'why are we here' question?
Black Kite is a perfect example, an absolutely perfect example. That guy is a dick's dick, he has abused his position to deceive the entire Wikipedia community multiple times, all to protect one of the worst ever violators of Wikipedia policy. All simply because Black Kite personally didn't think they should have ever faced any sanction, let alone his multiple sanctions, blocks, bans and arbcom cases. All this can be proven, it's all on record, it's all incontrovertible.
Black Kite is a classic example of the corruption at the heart of Wikipedia. That prick is never ever going to admit what he has done, and he has plenty of supporters given what he did, because many Wikipediots, especially those who find the current hemegony of Wikipediocracy attractive, lack morals and courage.
All Black Kite is actually interested in doing on their site is insulting those who expose him, and posting about what he wants to post about. Which is typically just low value self-serving crap. Opinion masquerading as analysis/fact. All of which he is allowed to do with impunity. The same goes for Dennis Brown.
Jake needs to think hard, what does tolerating that make him look like? Does that make him look like someone who wants a high quality discussion on a platform independent of Wikipedia. Or does that just make him look like he condones this behaviour? That he actually quite admires some of scummiest scum of Wikipedia, and isn't interested in holding them to account at all.
There is a massive difference between ensuring Wikipedians like Black Kite and Dennis Brown feel like they are welcome to post, on the off-chance there might be a benefit, and literally laying out a welcome mat and holding the other residents down while they shit down their neck.
Jake is in danger of painting himself as an apologist here. He needs to realise that if your purpose in life is exposure and criticism, sometimes its better to be right, than liked. Sometimes its better to be a little visited forum with high quality content, than a well frequented open sewer that merely apes what it supposedly exists to expose.
Wikipedia criticism is a niche activity. There are not many people who can do it well, it simply requires too much knowledge and reading to be able to produce stuff the Wikipediots can't easily discredit.
Ming's stuff is a classic example of the sort of easily shredded lightweight shite that gets posted by people who know little but have a high opinion of themselves and their knowledge/abilities. Jake is enabling these people. It is not a good look, since it is obvious he certainly knows enough to see these shit posts for what they are. This is not to say having little knowledge is bad, but those who lack knowledge, need to be receptive to that fact and be willing to learn.