Just six more posts this week. Only one can really be called Wikipedia criticism.....http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtop ... 41#p217041
Given the current competency level of most potential Arbcom 'candidates', I'd vote for NYB again. Kumioko, do you have some physical or electronic evidence of your allegations against NYB?
Seems like an admission that he is part of the problem - who the hell votes for Brad when the only rational choice given the candidates is N.O.T.A.? And the request to Kumioko seems more like it is aimed at shutting down criticism of Brad than of exposing him. Quite surprised, after all this time, he doesn't remember Kumi's story, or know where to look for clarification (one of the downsides of being crap at curating the content of a forum I guess).
He has clearly not stopped being a moderator, as this extremely disturbing announcement shows......http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtop ... 45#p217045
New Wikipediocracy policy: Don't use pictures of underage children in your avatars. Yes, we had two previous instances. Yes, it contributed to their being banned here. Also, no animated GIFs as avatars either.
Thank you and have a nice day.
I suppose it could be a joke, he didn't post it in the admin section but the thread in question. No smilies though, so he must be serious. This is fucked up, anyone know what these other cases are that he's talking about?
I'm loving the fact they're so hard up for members they're letting Guido join (or letting Poetlister pretend to be him for a bit of light relief)......although as can be seen, if it is him, they're not so much offering sympathy and assistance (Kumioko aside, but only for the usual reasons), but trolling and insulting him, up to and including calling him a pedophile. I suppose it offers some variety, they can't keep calling their fellow members they don't like alt-right Nazi stooges or whatever it was, it gets tedious after a while.
For a forum which is apparently deliberately trying to keep up good relations with the mucky mucks of Wikipedia because they apparently see some benefit to it, they sure did waste this golden opportunity presented to them - a twice banned Wikipedian turns up and says ArbCom is ignoring his emailed appeals - rather than using their contacts to verify the details and perhaps turn this into a story of how the Right of Appeal to ArbCom is non-existent (since it has been well established that their email backlog issue isn't anywhere near as bad as it used to be, so they can no longer plausibly claim to have simply nor seen it or had time to discuss it), they produce this pile of shit.
Archiving, because you know they're gonna want to memory hole it.....http://archive.is/GK63z