View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sun Sep 15, 2019 8:34 am




Reply to topic  [ 79 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next
The cowards of Wikipediocracy 
Author Message
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2018 8:50 pm
Posts: 3541
Reply with quote
Zoloft is remaining tight lipped over their identities, so I'll have to compile the list of likely suspects from memory.

These are the cowards. It's those who whined to him to have me ejected or supposedly they threatened they would leave, based on the losers who variously put me on 'ignore' because they couldn't handle being disagreed with, and had no sensible or even logical way to justify their ill thought out and often downright idiotic views.

All I did was question these people using my own hefty knowledge and experience, a forum being after all for precisely that purpose, and they freaked the fuck out. No backbone. No moral fibre. No courage in their convictions. No courage at all, really.

These precious snowflakes are seemingly founder members of the 'it's my opinion and I'm entitled to it' school of debate. As much as they might deny it given their membership of that board, but safe spaces were invented for them. The less of this sort of person in the world, the better.

Safe spaces are for genuine victims, who have genuinely done nothing wrong, and are genuinely being unfairly targeted. And opinions are for those who cnothing and use them responsibly, to educate and inform. If you can't do either, if you just want to vent or whine using your subjective bubble of reality as if it is literal reality, then there's Twitter.

What marks these drama queens out, is not that they ignored me, but as part of their performance, they of course made a big song and dance of it. Because obviously that's what you do when you can't stand someone because they're supposedly being abusive etc. I wasn't of course, Zoloft is a liar and a coward for enabling this shit in the name of "trying to maintain respect", but I'll address that elsewhere.

He is right to protect them, because I'm going to properly make their lives hell for making a mug out of me, Zoloft having led me to believe the forum was no longer operated as a pathetic little clique, and did now run on simple rules of mutual respect (I didn't believe him, but one has to keep proving these things, for science). None of them knows who I am, none of them knows how to get to me, but naturally most of them have Wikipedia accounts they cherish, a couple even stupidly broadcast their real identities.

If you're a genuine Wikipedia critic, you could do worse than join me in these endeavours. These people are not serious critics, and they most certainly do not deserve any kind of humane treatment. We're talking out and out bloodthirsty revenge here, and if you're anything like me, that's an activity you like, and definitely don't get bored of. It can't be ignored, it can't be avoided. They are already guilty of cowardice, and that's only the start.

John Carter.

http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/search. ... 9&sr=posts

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:C ... ohn_Carter

I forget why this prick put me on ignore, but he was the first. Showing his character, that wasn't enough for him, and he just kept popping up in thread after thread like a little bitch on heat, breathlessly urging others to see the light and ignore me.

Needless to say, the guy's knowledge of Wikipedia is ignorant to the point of dangerous. A highlight was his belief there's no inherent issue in allowing inactive admins to retain access to deleted material. Then there's the comfort he takes in the fact Doc James is a Wikipedian.

John Carter was of course the first person for whom their unwise decision to put me on ignore so as to maintain their own sad little bubble of reality, only helped to reveal their own ignorance, as they continued to try and claim things about me they couldn't possibly support, and which the forum content itself proved to be utter garbage. I obviously got a laugh out of having to make posts like this.....
Quote:
Someone tell this fool I am well aware of MEDRS, which he would know if he wasn't ignoring me.
The little bitch didn't respond of course. Zoloft did nothing to compell him to acknowledge his mistake, of course. Can't be disturbing a snowflake, mid-snowflake.

Ming

http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/search. ... 1&sr=posts

Ming doesn't reveal his Wikipedia account, but he must have one, he'd find it irresistible, the ability to Lord it over people and pretend like you're a supervillain. The guy readily admits he treats Wikipedia criticism as a hobby, and boy does it show. A few of his recent attempts to start threads have been simply embarrassing.....

http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtop ... f=8&t=9092
http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtop ... f=8&t=9084
http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtop ... =38&t=9087

The guy is an unfortunate victim of Libtard's disease - those threads were recent exceptions, perhaps due to their micro focus nature. To Ming, there's nothing that's wrong with Wikipedia that he can't lay at the door of the alt-right bogeymen. He genuinely struggled with the difference between Wikipedians sourcing a statement with examples, and a reliable source actually stating what is being claimed based on their own study of examples. That is Wikipedia sourcing 101 - basic, obvious, shit.

Cornered in his ignorance bubble, he literally pretended like this was a WP:BLUE issue! Yeah, right. It was an obvious fuckup by biased Wikipedians, and yet he wanted not one part of any criticism of Wikipedia for it. I'd hesitate to even call that bias on his part, it's sheer elitist arrogance, the very thing that has fueled the rise of the alt-right, who are none too impressed when libtards apply one set of rules to themselves, another to the munchkin nutjobs of the right.

Typefying Ming's mongish qualities, he would regularly claim he was being trolled or deliberately confused if he didn't understand a topic, and would use that to declare he was no longer interested in participating. Nothing to do with his lack of intelligence or experience of course. This got so bad, he actually jumped into a thread I started, made a tit of himself, then blamed me because I somehow induced him into it. Fucking idiot. The world doesn't need cosplay libtards like this, Wikipedia criticism certainly doesn't.

Casliber

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:C ... s/Casliber

http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/search. ... 2&sr=posts

Casliber is Cas Liber, former Wikipedia Arbitrator. This guy is well known to any experienced Wikipedia critic. The bloke is a disgrace, he was caught straight up lying, but of course Zoloft did nothing, because in his eyes, members should merely be satisfied to have caught such a big fish in an obvious lie, causing them to slink away, tail between their legs.

Not so great a theory when the whining little kernt can later blackmail him into ejecting the very people who expose his lies. Who is the master, who is the servant? When did Wikipediocracy become the play venue of choice for Wikipedia's high born? Arb NewYorkBrad of course strolls around like he owns the place, saying and doing just as he pleases, not once disturbed by a tap on the shoulder from Zoloft to remind him its a forum, not Royal Court for his proclamations.

Casliber's only real interest in the forum recently seems to be to try and pretend Eric Corbett isn't a turbocunt much deserving of a Wikipedia ban. Ye Gods, the lies he told to support that view. Big fat obvious lies. As obvious as Eric's abuses and violations. He seems to object so much to people having their say on his friend on a platform supposedly independent of Wikipedia style threats, he spent a good deal of time following me around, trying to provoke me. Zoloft of course, did nothing.

Curiously, amusingly even, he seems to think he knows me, and even tried to leverage this information to intimidate me. I guess Zoloft can hardly intervene when Tarantino is your one and only mod. His misidentification appears to be based on his belief Eric Corbett couldn't possibly have more than a handful of enemies, and so he's picked one. That's the sort of stupidity that typifies Cas. Not very bright, but considered a genius by the Wikipediots. One eyed man, and all that.

He was naturally crushed in the thread I got banned in, when I suggested when the Wikipedia replacement is built, he's going to realise his relentless wiki-stuffing will have all been for nothing, his life's work, a waste. The guy is so desperate to be seen as a worthwhile human being who has made good life choices, he conned people into thinking he'd put the hard yards in to create Wikipedia's five millionth article. They fell for it, of course.

That's the measure of this guy, a real deceptive slime ball. He revelled in the fact that even though this was known and obvious to genuine critics, it wouldn't endanger him. That's something beyond arrogance that is, a Messiah complex or such like. It certainly explains the boldness of his lies. Go big or go home.

Nothing that comes out of his mouth can be assumed to be either true or based on evidence, it's either a lie, or a gross Wikipediot level distortion of the reality of this world. And to avoid such a charge, he will of course evade and deflect and try every Wikipedian trick in the book to escape being held accountable for it. Deserves everything he gets, and more besides for all the things he's done we'll likely never know of.

Anroth

http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/search. ... 5&sr=posts

Apparently this guy has a Wikipedia account that he doesn't want the nutters of Wikipedia to know about.

The guy doesn't know much, but arrogantly presumes to tell other people they're nutters. Here's a typical example of how much of a thick prick he really is.....
Quote:
Commons has actually made a dent in the porn - slowly to be sure - but a lot of low quality crap is steadily being removed. Granted this may have to do with a number of bannings of people who liked to claim everything was in scope...
If challenged for some examples of these so called bannings, he'd have no answer. Not that he is in the habit of answering questions about stuff he says which, to those in the know, will naturally sound ill-informed to the point of moronic.

A lot of people on Wikipediocracy like to talk an awful lot of bollocks about Commons, I suppose out of a desire to fit in and sound like one of the cool kids of English Wikipedia, who of course have never done anything like endanger children or peddled in smut (false and false), and that's probably all this was.

This guy is so thick, so quick to put people who threaten his selr-imposed retardity on ignore, in latter days he actually suspected me of being a sock of Dan Murphy because he detected some similarities in our "foaming-at-the-mouth rabid badger" incoherence. Murphy is the guy who had recently grossly insulted me because of our diametrically opposite views, something the dipshit Anroth had of course missed, safe as he was in his little snowflake bubble. Zoloft didn't take any action in that incident, nor for Anroth's insult - you may be sensing a pattern by now.

Perhaps typifying the sort of person Anroth is, despite his regular reminders by him to the world that he was ignoring me because I'm just thick, he happily joined in a topic I had began, making some rare sensible points (not that it was a difficult issue to understand).

http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtop ... 23#p215823

I can only presume Anroth simply didn't notice who was involved, who had done the leg work to bring that incident to the board's attention. Ungrateful cunt. We'll see how he fares with what's left - he does rather seem to hate everyone there, and isn't shy about letting them know. No action from Zoloft, of course.

AndyTheGrump

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:C ... dyTheGrump

http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/search. ... 2&sr=posts

Supposedly retired from Wikipedia, Andy is like his name, an angry asshole.

This prick has a nasty habit of exiting any and every thread he's in difficulties in, by claiming his opponent is too thick to understand what he's saying or is misrepresenting him, and therefore he's out. The little bitch ran away from me, putting me on ignore, simply because I demonstrated as a response to his characteristicslly assholish objection to a perfectly fine observation, that he is beyond thick, not even possessing the level of skill or experience in coding a literal child would have......

http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtop ... =43&t=8865

This apparently upset dear little Andy, and he held quite the grudge, for quite a while, popping up in thread after thread in cravenly opportunistic attempts to get his own back. Like a pathetic little child, he just begged and begged for my attention, while also having me on ignore of course. Just like a nasty little piece of shit Wikipedian would. No action from Zoloft, of course.

As I type, Andy is just casually insulting a seriously mentally disturbed forum member, telling them to get a life, and showing no remorse when told to cut it out. That's normal for him. You'd think he's have a thicker skin, being a rough tough sociopath? Evidently not.

Anyone else?

That's all I remember. If I missed one of your precious flowers out, and you think your need some recognition now, by all means let me know.

Naturally, as small as Wikipediocracy is under Zoloft's dire and hypocritical leadership, this list of malcontents doesn't exactly represent a very big chunk of the active forum membership, perhaps less than a third. So there may be others who cried to Zoloft too, to make him feel like treating me like a bitch was worth the inevitable payback, but never made their views known publicly. Maybe they'll take the opportunity now, or maybe they'll just be the silent type. I'll probably find out anyway, so enjoy it now, while you can.

So, release the hounds. Or not. Best part of this game is making people wonder if anything will come of this or not. Did I really just type all that, if I have no intention of acting on it? Do you feel lucky, snowflake?


Tue Feb 27, 2018 11:53 am
Profile
Psyop
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 3:25 pm
Posts: 540
Location: Elsewhere
Reply with quote
Quote:
....this list of malcontents doesn't exactly represent a very big chunk of the active forum membership, perhaps less than a third.


The number of active users on WO's message board (WO-MB) was always shockingly low - they had hundreds of registered accounts who never posted once, and Monty Burns told me that they were Wikipedians and fellow-travelers monitoring the site.

So who is/was IRWolfie?

Quote:
....I'd hesitate to even call that bias on his part, it's sheer elitist arrogance, the very thing that has fueled the rise of the alt-right, who are none too impressed when libtards apply one set of rules to themselves, another to the munchkin nutjobs of the right.


I don't think the politics of the 20-something Right fit with WO or Wikipedia - it's more computer/IT wannabees/has-beens ranting about this has-been website (en.Wikipedia) that desperately needs to change direction, give up on only using free labor, hire some proofreaders from the ruined encyclopedias Wikipedia left behind in its wake, and polish that turd into a decent research site.

_________________
Still "Globally Banned" on Wikipedia for the high crime of journalism.


Tue Feb 27, 2018 8:53 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2018 8:50 pm
Posts: 3541
Reply with quote
Are you saying IRWolfie is one of these cowards? They did have a poster by this name, but they haven't posted since Sep 2014, and didn't break the 100 barrier in their 18 month stay. That doesn't suggest to me he's still active. There is a user on Wikipedia called IRWolfie-, but he changed name to Second Quantization, before chucking the towel in at the end of 2015. He wisely concluded.....
Quote:
I'm not sure fixing anything on wikipedia is really worth my time

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... =689318481


Wed Feb 28, 2018 1:39 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 8:20 am
Posts: 2716
Reply with quote
It's just a forum with the right name, Wikipediocrazy, that's all. They claim to be a critical forum, but if members are too critical the wikipedia die hards start to complain and telling they leave the place. And because of that they mute the critical members.
I think Zoloft did the only wise thing he could do. To quitte.

Now we have that Anita nonsens, nobody dares to say it, but I do. She is a part of that WMF gender nonsens, I know how here friends are, most of them are Dutch wikifools from Wikidata. And, she is a bit disappointed in that bunch of idiots. And what is she doing? Complaining on Wikipediocrazy, but keep on to be a part of that crazy system!
And she agrees with me one moment, and the other moment she is 100% wikipedia gender bull.
And start to complain about me, I am suddenly a sexist! And not because I am, but only because I keep on saying the complete gender approch of Wikipedia is 100% bull, and wil not solve any problem. It makes it only worser. But if I say so, madam Erika + compagnons start to bomb Zoloft with mails, and I get mute, now for the second time!

I consider it as complete unacceptable some WOC members were allowed to post parts of statements of the Dutch arbcom, and to justify that corrupt global block. It made to me complete clear what Wikipediocrazy is, it's a part of the corrupt wikipedia/ WMF system. It's a North Korea trick, to create the illusion of criticism.

_________________
Mijn blog. (In Dutch) of kom eens gezellig bij de Kolonel langs in Eerbeek.
En kijk eens hier, het "Verboden" lijstje van door mij aangemaakte artiklen.

. Image
.Winner of
The SanBan


Wed Feb 28, 2018 3:32 am
Profile

Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 5:55 pm
Posts: 79
Reply with quote
Graaf Statler wrote:
[...]Wikipediocrazy[...]


Wikipediocrazy.com is available if anyone wants to start yet another Wikipedia criticism site :lol:

(edited)


Thu Mar 01, 2018 8:30 pm
Profile WWW
Psyop
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 5:56 pm
Posts: 1505
Reply with quote
Strelnikov wrote:
The number of active users on WO's message board (WO-MB) was always shockingly low - they had hundreds of registered accounts who never posted once, and Monty Burns told me that they were Wikipedians and fellow-travelers monitoring the site.

Correct, I figure that at least 80% of their posts come from the same group of 50-or-so users.

Quote:
So who is/was IRWolfie?

I though it was Hullabaloo Wolfowitz but someone autistically-screeched at me it was someone else....


Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:20 am
Profile
Psyop
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 3:25 pm
Posts: 540
Location: Elsewhere
Reply with quote
ericbarbour wrote:
Strelnikov wrote:
The number of active users on WO's message board (WO-MB) was always shockingly low - they had hundreds of registered accounts who never posted once, and Monty Burns told me that they were Wikipedians and fellow-travelers monitoring the site.

Correct, I figure that at least 80% of their posts come from the same group of 50-or-so users.

Quote:
So who is/was IRWolfie?

I though it was Hullabaloo Wolfowitz but someone autistically-screeched at me it was someone else....


That question was a test of knowledge; if you do a simple Google search for the name it turns out that he ticked off believers in Dewy B. Larson's "Reciprocal Theory" by deleting Larson's BLP with the help of William M. Connolley, and the page where I found that lists a possible name, address, and place of work. There is an extra-snarky BLP-debunking-ritual humiliation* of Larson on RationalWiki.

I'd known about the page with IRWolfie's alleged real name for years, and that might have been the secret reason why I was kicked out of WO-MB, a crack to him about "those Reciprocal people coming to talk with you" (which is something they write about doing on that page!) to which the guy said nothing.

_______________________
*Larson is dead, yet he is called "...an otherwise irrelevant American engineer", "....nothing more than a lone crank". One of his supporters is a guy named Ronald "Ron" Satz, and a picture of one of his equations to "prove" Larson's theories has under it the legend "One of Ron Satz's equations. Donald Knuth is rolling in his grave and he isn't even dead yet."

_________________
Still "Globally Banned" on Wikipedia for the high crime of journalism.


Sat Mar 03, 2018 6:12 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2018 8:50 pm
Posts: 3541
Reply with quote
http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtop ... 69#p216369

John Carter and Anroth are now going at each other, both believing the other to be, well, crazy. Both of these fucknuts accused me of being a know nothing idiot too.

These statements can't all be true.

Hey Zoloft, you see these two fuckwits? They're the guys you chose over me. You ever see anyone on your forum actually demonstrate I'm an idiot? Prove that I don't know what the fuck I'm talking about? Or was it only ever a case of whiny little bitches like these two losing an argument with me, having their pride dented, and looking for an easy way to lash out?

Maybe one day you'll get it. Maybe one day you'll realise one person of integrity is worth five cowardly assholes. Or maybe you'll just shuffle off this mortal coil having been the person to take a promising critic website, and flush it down the toilet.

Both of these people are die hard Wikipedians, one so addicted he edits from work (or feels it necessary to claim he edits from work), then other desperately trying to get unblocked while pretending he's totally cool with being blocked. There's your fucking problem, right there. The only sane, rational people you'll ever meet in this game, are not Wikipedians. They're batshit crazy, high as kites. They'll say anything and do anything to save face. Weak minded people, with weak moral fibre. You side with them over people who know what they're actually talking about, you'll always ending looking the real fool.


Mon Mar 05, 2018 3:41 pm
Profile
Psyop
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 5:56 pm
Posts: 1505
Reply with quote
CrowsNest wrote:
Both of these people are die hard Wikipedians, one so addicted he edits from work (or feels it necessary to claim he edits from work), then other desperately trying to get unblocked while pretending he's totally cool with being blocked. There's your fucking problem, right there. The only sane, rational people you'll ever meet in this game, are not Wikipedians. They're batshit crazy, high as kites. They'll say anything and do anything to save face. Weak minded people, with weak moral fibre. You side with them over people who know what they're actually talking about, you'll always ending looking the real fool.

Been saying that for years. It's a nut magnet first and foremost. The "encyclopedia" part is well down on any honest list of what Wikipedia is. (They still have that stupid WP:NOT article. Nearly all of which is stinking and provable lies.)

Quote:
I'd known about the page with IRWolfie's alleged real name for years, and that might have been the secret reason why I was kicked out of WO-MB, a crack to him about "those Reciprocal people coming to talk with you" (which is something they write about doing on that page!) to which the guy said nothing.

Ah, thanks, saw that a while ago and forgot. There's a Larson article right now, recreated in 2014 by an obvious sockpuppet.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:C ... s/Pictorex

The Dewey Larson thing reminds me of famed numbnut Scott "Goethean" Zimmerle and his decade-long attempt to use Wikipedia to venerate his favorite crackpot "philosopher" Ken Wilber. Didn't get what he wanted until he talked Gamaliel into "protecting" him. Wilber's article is still a honeypot for idiots and crazies. Goethean got it up to 60k bytes of mostly fatuous ravings, until others started cutting it down in May 2015. Obviously Gamaliel's political power on WP is fading; Goethean has been keeping a very low profile since 2015.


Tue Mar 06, 2018 12:47 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2018 8:50 pm
Posts: 3541
Reply with quote
http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtop ... 66#p217066
AndyTheGrump wrote:
If people want to read the drivel on WS, that's up to them).
Andy, you're a whiny little bitch. Don't pretend like you don't care what people read, you're a fragile little child who can't stand to be criticized. You're the exact sort of person people think about when they ponder who really needs a safe space, who hasn't got the guts to be in the presence of words on the internet that they don't like? Your grump persona is innacurate, you're not a grump, you're a snowflake.

To remind people who take the time to come here and read our "drivel", you claimed it is impossible to write a filter that disallows "Anna-Christina Schwartz" and variants, but allows "Alexander & Anna Schwartz Farm". Specifically, you proferred....
Quote:
I'm sure the Wikipedia article title filter could be improved, but criticising it for not being able to do something that no other filter can do either is just plain stupid.
I will repeat, a grade schooler can do a better job with the tools available to the Wikipediots who code & administer the super-sekrit edit filters, and as such, you're an ignorant muppet.

How do you like that drivel? Not a lot, it seems. Never mind, Zoloft will always be there in your safe space, to protect your fragile little ass.


Sat Mar 24, 2018 12:11 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 79 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group ColorizeIt.
Designed by ST Software.