God, someone just put this fool out of his misery, he's embarrassing......
the ability of new and unconfirmed editors to not create articles at all in mainspace is a result of years of verifiable utter dross being created.
It would have taken just five minutes to first recall that an influx of dross had never been a major concern of the Wikipedians, then figure out the reason they instituted the ban, years down the line with much dross having made it in, was only once they realised (or just began to believe, since no supporting data was ever provided of course) that much of this dross is the evil undeclared paid editing.
Prior to AFC the first a new editor would hear of problems would their shitty article being PROD'd or speedied.
What's your point? Is this somehow an improvement? Thanks to morons like you, now newbies don't hear of problems at all, until four months has elapsed. It was much preferable to let them publish and be immediately given feedback. The answer to that feedback often being wildly hostile, was better training of patrollers.
As has been explained, its designed specifically to shut down awful content from hitting articlespace. That is its purpose and its very good at it. Its not flawed for doing what it is supposed to do.
Eh? It is a blunt instrument designed to keep all potential contributions from newbies away from the mainspace, on the ridiculous assumption that so much of it is garbage, you can afford to lose the editors and content that might not be. It is poorly conceived, poorly designed, and poorly executed. It exists because the people who love it, morons like you, can't even give an honest account of what it is, or you are just too thick to even understand what it is.
Plenty of female editors also contribute significantly to the toxicity (as anyone who is interested in Horses finds out pretty quickly). Ask poetlister about the ratio of toxic female editors as a fraction of the female editor total, compared to the ratio of the toxic male editors to the male editing numbers.
How typical of this male brained fuckwit. What he just described is the inevitable result of Wikipedia being such a hostile environment for women, that only the really horrible ones persist with it. People like the horse obsessive he refers to.