This is why these spunk bubbles can think of nothing to say to me except pretend like I'm
90210 wrote:It would not be the first time someone used the terminology "abusive socking" for something totally innocuous.
Seems outrageous to claim he was "abusively socking" and providing as your "evidence" that he used an account (while he didn't have access to his old account) to make legitimate edits.
Perhaps this was a legitimate block, but knowing this ArbCom as I do...
What the fuck do you actually know
, you utter retard?
"Abusive" sock-puppetry is any sock-puppetry that is not permitted. All edits by unapproved socks are considered illegitimate, productive or otherwise, just like all edits by a banned user are considered exempt from 3RR.
That's WP:SOCK 101, you dumbass. A policy position handed down to assorted editors all day every day on stone tablets, from Wikipedia Administrative luminaries ranging from Bbb23 to Queen Bishonen. You're an idiot if you claim otherwise.
Eric is not the first little wank to think that somehow he can escape a sock block by not being disruptive or incivil while socking, it's a tactic used by many a disruptive user intent on making a point about their unblockability rather than benefiting Wikipedia. That's why you never see good people doing it, or even claiming they do it. It's always self-absorbed little assholes like Kumioko.
You also cannot retire an old account and start a new one if you are under current sanctions or facing an Arbitration Case. This would not under any circumstances, except the rampant corruption of a Wikipedia run by Black Kite, be considered a legitimate WP:CLEANSTART. You're an idiot if you claim otherwise.
People who deliberately lock themselves out of their old account, if we are stupid enough to even believe this is what Eric did, are given just one option for a legitimate return - contact the appropriate people to retain access to that account, or if not possible, be given a legitimate new account which meets all the requirements for disclosure. A WP:CLEANSTART is not and never could be a way to simply get around the fact you have locked yourself out of your old account but don't actually want to retire.
No ifs, no buts. No WP.IAR.
There is no "perhaps" about this at all, unless you are claiming Eric did not create that sock. That is why he has gone that route in an attempt to extend the drama, so you should really pay attention to what the scum you're trying to defend are actually doing to further their sad little causes, and if you're that way inclined, copy them.
What have you got to say to that? Go on, SAY SOME SHIT.
Or carrying on being the little bitch who has to hide behind Uncle Jake's skirts, protecting you from the harsh dose of reality that little pricks like you need, for the general improvement of humanity overall.
You know what to do, Dysk.