Here's a rant about how Wikipedians care more about politics than the encyclopedia.

CrowsNest wrote:Legal action against Wikipedia: Basics 101
https://thewikicabal.com/2018/08/19/leg ... 01-basics/
....................................For anyone looking to write something on the legal aspects of Wikipedia, there has in fact been plenty of real cases with which to base your posts on. I also recommend speaking to forum members Abd and WHHP, just two who, AFAIK, have gone the legal route.
Glad to see it.Dysklyver wrote:Yep I have been getting lazy.
Here's a rant about how Wikipedians care more about politics than the encyclopedia.
sashi wrote:That table at the end is very interesting, where did you dig all that info up? There are quite literally hundreds of thousands of links to the sites mentioned as unreliable in that table.
There's a typo, "matian".
Graaf Statler wrote:Isn't that not much more interest for a lawyer than a stupide fuck like Midsize Jake with his o, just send a take down notice, yes Jake but we have a pay or I sew you system and even a 200X200px picture can be expensive, o we wait for a trail and I mute you. It is all so extreem stupide there, it is useless to discus with them.