https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/18/busi ... imura.html
Mr. Nishimura, he said, spent countless hours thinking up ways to avoid laws and regulations. The servers used by 2channel were based in the United States, beyond the reach of Japanese law.
Mr. Nishimura, he said, spent countless hours thinking up ways to avoid laws and regulations. The servers used by 2channel were based in the United States, beyond the reach of Japanese law.
The case was brought by the family of Nohemi Gonzalez, who was killed in the 2015 Islamic State terrorist attack in Paris. The plaintiffs claim that YouTube, a unit of Google, aided ISIS by recommending the terrorist group’s videos to users.
Lol “avoid the paywall.” (Copyright)ericbarbour wrote: ↑Mon Jan 16, 2023 12:42 amavoid their paywall and use the archive
https://archive.ph/LZfa8The case was brought by the family of Nohemi Gonzalez, who was killed in the 2015 Islamic State terrorist attack in Paris. The plaintiffs claim that YouTube, a unit of Google, aided ISIS by recommending the terrorist group’s videos to users.
The full amicus brief: https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/ ... dation.pdf“Without Section 230, Wikipedia could not exist,” says Jacob Rogers, associate general counsel at the Wikimedia Foundation. He says the community of volunteers that manages content on Wikipedia “designs content moderation policies and processes that reflect the nuances of sharing free knowledge with the world. Alterations to Section 230 would jeopardize this process by centralizing content moderation further, eliminating communal voices, and reducing freedom of speech.”
In its own brief to the Supreme Court, Wikimedia warned that changes to liability will leave smaller technology companies unable to compete with the bigger companies that can afford to fight a host of lawsuits. “The costs of defending suits challenging the content hosted on Wikimedia Foundation’s sites would pose existential threats to the organization,” lawyers for the foundation wrote.
“It is true that Reddit has a different model for content moderation, but what they aren’t telling you is that some communities are moderated by and populated by incels, white supremacists, racists, election deniers, covid deniers, etc.,” he says.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:FromthestretchAccording to Bloomberg Businessweek, this mechanism is an example of "how to make money rebuilding reputations: have them destroyed first", which is why a federal court stated that victims have "probable cause to sue for extortion and racketeering".[8][9] As of 2021, Google Search started to consider this practice deceptive and to downrank Ripoff Report's webpages.