Wikipedia Sucks!

ericbarbour wrote:Weirdly enough, Gondelman has a WP bio. Mostly written by that little shit Everymorning. I have to wonder if Gondelman paid him.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... on=history

This is pretty clear here. Jytdog is conducting a personal vendetta against Wiki What? based on one article from a fringe industry publication that he seems to think says that Esquire magazine is not a notable source and that this is some sort of Machiavellian scheme with a harmful agenda to Wikipedia. It's not. It's actually just a funny comedic Wikipedia positive series. -- BrillLyle (talk) 23:29, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

"Thanks for your notes. We are already talking on the talk page. Your claims about harassment are dead wrong; I am following the additions of Wiki What to WP. If you are doing them, then I am going to see those edits and react to them. It is not about you. I already wrote that at the article talk page. Jytdog (talk) 23:08, 1 October 2017 (UTC)"

No. You don't get the right to say that this is just isolated to the Talk page of one article. You are taking a personal agenda and conducting an online campaign against Wiki What? It's not okay. Do not try to manage my response or my concerns. It is patronizing behavior, and I know your pattern of filibustering edits and cowing them -- turning legitimate concerns over unconstructive editing so that it pushes back negatively on the person bringing up the violation of conduct which you display. This is unacceptable behavior. BrillLyle (talk) 23:33, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
Also, I know you must derive some sort of pleasure or satisfaction in doing this. It is harassment and your behavior is attacking, aggressive, and nasty. I am doing nothing wrong here. You are. BrillLyle (talk) 23:33, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

I am sorry you are taking this so personally and reading such negative things in. There is medical content I really wanted to get to today, and this refspam stuff is a distraction. Not joyful. Jytdog (talk) 23:39, 1 October 2017 (UTC)