CNET is no longer a "reliable source"
Posted: Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:28 am
Barely noticed this week:
https://futurism.com/wikipedia-cnet-unreliable-ai
OF COURSE that gigantic asshole David Gerard is behind it. OF COURSE. And it happened a year ago.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... t_Money%22
I checked--Wikipedia currently has 11,154 links to cnet.com. It will take a LONG time to remove them all.
Meanwhile I've seen NO concerted attempt by the Wiki-Bungs to deal with AI-generated "journalism". Given how difficult it is for human readers to tell the difference, I expect they will fuck this up too.
https://futurism.com/wikipedia-cnet-unreliable-ai
OF COURSE that gigantic asshole David Gerard is behind it. OF COURSE. And it happened a year ago.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... t_Money%22
I checked--Wikipedia currently has 11,154 links to cnet.com. It will take a LONG time to remove them all.
Meanwhile I've seen NO concerted attempt by the Wiki-Bungs to deal with AI-generated "journalism". Given how difficult it is for human readers to tell the difference, I expect they will fuck this up too.