Good, bad, biased, paid or what-have-you. There's an endless supply.
-
Bbb23sucks
- Sucker
- Posts: 1411
- Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2023 9:08 am
- Location: The Astral Plane
- Has thanked: 1475 times
- Been thanked: 300 times
Post
by Bbb23sucks » Wed Jan 17, 2024 2:32 am
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_LGBTQ ... _in_Brazil
Wow, this is one of worst articles I have seen on Wikipedia. At first, it looks undersourced, but it's actually worse than that. The "sources" are just republished versions of the same study. The study is very obscure outside of pop science articles and was probably highly flawed.
A proper study in 2019 found the results you would expect, and that was 10 years later:
https://agenciadenoticias.ibge.gov.br/e ... al-in-2019
Among persons aged 18 and over, 94.8% reported being heterosexual; 1.2% homosexual; 0.7% bisexual; 1.1% did not know their sexual orientation; 2.3% did not answer; and 0.1% reported having another sexual orientation.
"Globally banned" since September 5, 2023 for exposing harassment.
-
boredbird
- Sucks Mod
- Posts: 626
- Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2017 3:24 am
- Has thanked: 786 times
- Been thanked: 382 times
Post
by boredbird » Wed Jan 17, 2024 4:39 am
Bbb23sucks wrote: ↑Wed Jan 17, 2024 2:32 am
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_LGBTQ ... _in_Brazil
Wow, this is one of worst articles I have seen on Wikipedia. At first, it looks undersourced, but it's actually worse than that. The "sources" are just republished versions of the same study. The study is very obscure outside of pop science articles and was probably highly flawed.
More like 38.15%, in my experience. Damn I love Brazil.
-
Dr Mario
- Sucks
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2020 12:54 pm
- Has thanked: 20 times
- Been thanked: 26 times
Post
by Dr Mario » Sat Feb 17, 2024 4:13 am
Wikipedia claims a bunch of junk is a reliable source and then cites it.
One man trash is another treasury.
-
badmachine
- Sucker
- Posts: 548
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:55 am
- Has thanked: 722 times
- Been thanked: 326 times
-
Contact:
Post
by badmachine » Sat Feb 17, 2024 4:18 am
Bbb23sucks wrote: ↑Wed Jan 17, 2024 2:32 am
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_LGBTQ ... _in_Brazil
Wow, this is one of worst articles I have seen on Wikipedia. At first, it looks undersourced, but it's actually worse than that. The "sources" are just republished versions of the same study. The study is very obscure outside of pop science articles and was probably highly flawed.
A proper study in 2019 found the results you would expect, and that was 10 years later:
https://agenciadenoticias.ibge.gov.br/e ... al-in-2019
Among persons aged 18 and over, 94.8% reported being heterosexual; 1.2% homosexual; 0.7% bisexual; 1.1% did not know their sexual orientation; 2.3% did not answer; and 0.1% reported having another sexual orientation.
wow
This section needs expansion with: examples of culture, every day life, societal acceptance and high quality citations. You can help by adding to it. (November 2020)
ive never seen that tag in the lead paragraph before. wikipedia- always improving
