Mansplaining
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 6:43 pm
I don't think I have ever seen a sentence like the following, in a Wikipedia list....
For that nominal task, the list itself is properly rubbish, but in comparison to noting the mansplaining, that seems almost a banality, its reasons well understood by critics, if not the media, pseudo-critics or the Wikipedians themselves.
This patronising note, whose odd nomenclature rather obscures the fact it is talking about two little arrows whose likely purpose must be obvious to anyone capable of browsing the internet, man, woman or child, was added to the list in December 2018, and has been seen by hundreds of readers ever since. That is the sad truth of where Wikipedia stands today, in its efforts to fix its gender problem.
It only appears in one list, "List of pioneers in computer science" bizarrely enough, and while not initially obvious, the reason why the man who added it might have done so, looks awfully likely to be because it was in his mind that the list was or will be getting lots of views from women and girls looking for inspiration as to their chances of carving out successful careers in the tech industry.to put the list in chronological order, click the small "up-down" icon
For that nominal task, the list itself is properly rubbish, but in comparison to noting the mansplaining, that seems almost a banality, its reasons well understood by critics, if not the media, pseudo-critics or the Wikipedians themselves.
This patronising note, whose odd nomenclature rather obscures the fact it is talking about two little arrows whose likely purpose must be obvious to anyone capable of browsing the internet, man, woman or child, was added to the list in December 2018, and has been seen by hundreds of readers ever since. That is the sad truth of where Wikipedia stands today, in its efforts to fix its gender problem.