AP: centre
BBC: left of centre
NYT/Bloomberg: left
....was probably quite a good survey.
https://www.allsides.com/blog/how-reade ... s-and-more
The Wikishits disagree. Why? One result that offends them.....
Epoch Times: centre (if a touch right)
To the Wikipedia communtiy, as the very first commenter made clear, sources perceived as having any flavour of right in them, as perceived by the general public (worth noting here that the Daily Mail is is the most popular and seen as the most right wing UK newspaper), have quite another classification in Wikipedia:
That person is one of many senior Wikipedia editors that have found a home at Wikipediocracy.Epoch Times is straight garbage.
Way to sell out, Jake. Always happy to promote the idea that Wikipedia editors opinons trump that of the general public, with one specific incident applauded in that forum now making a lot of sense.
Remember that time when Ming the Mong said it didn't matter if Wikipedia was calling The Gateway Pundit nothing but a promoter of conspiracy theories didn't have a source to back that claim up, because the only source you needed was Google and your own eyes?
I remember it. I rememeber how I was treated like I was crazy for expecting Wikipedia to have to provide sources for such things. Even though THAT IS THEIR CKEARLY STATED POLICY.
Relevance?
Well, the culture is alive and well on Wikipedia, no thanks to Wikipediocracy.....
They are also rubbish the idea that 2,000 is big enough of a survey. Uh huh. And how few people did it take to get the Mail banned as "generally unreliable" on Wikipedia? Around 50, if I recall. The self-selecting nature of Wikishits as a survey group, also being rather obvious.Epoch Times is listed in Wikipedia as a far-right source (and this is a statement made in Wikivoice)