Lets just parse the keywords to english from "newspeak"
-Verifiability = Someone said something that got picked up by or pushed onto the internet
-Reliable Source = Someone was paid to publish opinion, information, or narrative
The essay "Verifiability is not the truth" suggests that "verifiability" is just a starting point. In application on Wikipedia "verifiability is everything" in and of itself. (He said she said and it got published on a corporate website - that is all that is necessary).
"Book" references are an intractable way to stick content up Wikipedia's ass. Nobody can contend with them - you can make up whatever you want to and throw in a gazillion footnotes.
So yeah, it's a feedback loop
"On Wikipedia, there is no truth" ... just the "mass delusion of reality"
"Twitter Files" is a working example of dissonance of the highest order.
--Musk releases internal information from Twitter to a group of "reliable sources" he selected to drive the news cycle with a narrative
--Wikipedians pick up on the narrative complete with support from "reliable sources" which can be verified
--The "Twitter Files" is born
--Folks with a "competing narrative" push the article into AFD (articles for deletion)
--The AFD becomes a war between "two competing narratives" from diametrically opposed "reliable sources" - "Alternate facts"
--Musk puts out a tweet "Trolling" Wikipedia and dopey Jimbo Wales" takes the bait
--There is enough support for an article talking about the Musk-Wales interchange
------A search for "Musk takes on Wikipedia" will yield at least three reliable and verifiable sources
-----Of course an article "Musk takes on Wikipedia' will never be allowed to gestate
--An encyclopedia is not the news (another failed axiom)
But, but, yeah, but;
"We are living at a time where competing narratives and alternate facts dominate the information landscape" Emilio Mole
Wikipedia played a big part in providing "truth" to the phrase "alternate facts" that was brilliantly true but widely mocked.
Nobody will be objective enough to realize fact is fact; and Wikipedia does not speak to fact or truth.
"Twitter Files" continues to be an ongoing battlefield in a Musk engineered puke fest war titillating two sides of a competing narrative. No sorry, that is not what an encyclopedia is for - or what an encyclopedia is. Don't feed the trolls, another failed Wikipedia Axiom.
Wikipedia - "Barely competent and paranoid. There’s a hell of a combination."