Only done to major editwar targets. Someone appears to have added legitimate, verifiable info. Perhaps that INC. magazine article is "condemned" because it embarasses poor little Brianna? And 20 minutes later Amanda removed it and started screaming at other admins to "hard protect" the damn thing. It is assumed that anyone editing Wu's article is out to "defame" the "trans hero of gamergate". 151 people are watchlisting it so clearly it is "untouchable".Bbb23sucks wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2023 5:03 pmThey have now INDEFINITELY protected it! https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... on=history
I didn't even know that was allowed in article space.
This stupid "event" is unhinged but it is also not unknown. Wiki-Mental-Illness in purified form.
As I keep telling you, any article that attracts WP's most insane insiders, in this manner, is always a bad article. It would not surprise me that (if Wikipedia even lasts that long) in 20 years Wu will be forgotten and some bot-driving patroller will put this article up for deletion.