WP is a celeb tabloid (and LIES about it)
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2023 10:27 pm
Today's crass example: within MINUTES of this story hitting the media yesterday, there was a long rant posted on his WP bio. And it instantly attracted editwarring. Courcelles slapped protection on it, which only attracted insider assholes like Black Kite, Sandstein, and "golden Wiki-god" Andy Mabbett. The squabbling continued today.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huw_Edwar ... suspension
They hate UK tabloids? Then why is THIS CRAP in there?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huw_Edwar ... suspension
They hate UK tabloids? Then why is THIS CRAP in there?
Already tried to purge the Daily Mail, and tried to slap the Sun with the same brush in 2018. And repeatedly at other times. Did not get very far.Following both the statement by the police and that released by Edward's wife, The Sun distanced itself from the situation claiming that it never insinuated criminality on the part of Edwards while stating that it would cooperate with the BBC's internal investigation and that it wouldn't publish further allegations regarding Edwards.[45]
PS: Andy Dingley is still a little shit. But Gerard is still the biggest shit.I understand exactly what the proposal means. and I agree with Andy Dingley about how discretionary sanctions notices are being misused. Wikipedia is becoming more punitive and combative. It's no wonder editors are fleeing in droves. Morgan Leigh | Talk 21:02, 27 November 2018 (UTC)