Pedophiles defended on Wikipedia
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2025 5:58 pm
Look at this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_ ... raphy_case
So much for BALANCE. Some 10-15 sources on how they found tens of thousands of images and videos on his computer that were downloaded in the course of 15-20 years, how he admitted to having child pornography because he didn't think it was a big deal, how the cops caught him while he was downloading child pornography, all supported by articles from the BBC, Independent, The Telegraph, The Guardian, ... this is given a paragraph.
Then a longer paragraph is written based on a book by some American conservative author and one Radio Free Europe/Russia article where they claim Bukovsky was a target of Russian FSB propaganda and smear campaign, how the hackers placed those images on his computer without him knowing.
Despite the overwhelming RS consensus, the article is written in a way to cast doubt on his pedophilia, and suggests it was all done to him because he was a Soviet "dissident". Since he is a brave anti-communist, CHILDPROTECT doesn't apply here, and anyone suggesting it does is an FSB agent!
The brave dissident Bukovsky escaped evil, Soviet Russia where it was illegal to collect photos of childrape, and he could finally enjoy the intellectual freedom and independent thinking of the West by spending his life collecting dozens of gigabytes of child pornography.
The page is watched over/protected/patrolled by "User:My very best wishes", either a Russian émigré or first generation Russian living in the US. As a Russian émigré he is most definitely anti-communist, deeply conservative, and most likely a nonce to boot.
On his user page, My very best wishes writes "I do not take my editing here too seriously, more like entertainment or adventure." Presumably, he considers whitewashing pedophiles and trying to label Russia "neo-fascist" [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk ... 50:00.000Z] adventurous and entertaining.
So much for BALANCE. Some 10-15 sources on how they found tens of thousands of images and videos on his computer that were downloaded in the course of 15-20 years, how he admitted to having child pornography because he didn't think it was a big deal, how the cops caught him while he was downloading child pornography, all supported by articles from the BBC, Independent, The Telegraph, The Guardian, ... this is given a paragraph.
Then a longer paragraph is written based on a book by some American conservative author and one Radio Free Europe/Russia article where they claim Bukovsky was a target of Russian FSB propaganda and smear campaign, how the hackers placed those images on his computer without him knowing.
Despite the overwhelming RS consensus, the article is written in a way to cast doubt on his pedophilia, and suggests it was all done to him because he was a Soviet "dissident". Since he is a brave anti-communist, CHILDPROTECT doesn't apply here, and anyone suggesting it does is an FSB agent!
The brave dissident Bukovsky escaped evil, Soviet Russia where it was illegal to collect photos of childrape, and he could finally enjoy the intellectual freedom and independent thinking of the West by spending his life collecting dozens of gigabytes of child pornography.
The page is watched over/protected/patrolled by "User:My very best wishes", either a Russian émigré or first generation Russian living in the US. As a Russian émigré he is most definitely anti-communist, deeply conservative, and most likely a nonce to boot.
On his user page, My very best wishes writes "I do not take my editing here too seriously, more like entertainment or adventure." Presumably, he considers whitewashing pedophiles and trying to label Russia "neo-fascist" [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk ... 50:00.000Z] adventurous and entertaining.