Wikipedia ruled by 'Lord of the Universe'
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2017 5:01 am
.
BADSITEBADSITEBADSITE
https://www.wikipediasucks.co/forum/
You can either a) correct it, b) engage somebody on Fiverr to correct it or c) learn the basics of socking - if you want some old autoconfirmed accounts we have thousands of them so giving u 2 or 3 won't make much difference to our stock.Soham321 wrote:Soham321 wrote:is TimothyJosephWood a devotee of Swami Nithyananda. if not why is he taking so much interest in sanitizing the WP article about Nithyananda?
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Swami_Nithyananda&diff=770280681&oldid=770280253
TimothyJosephWood removed the word 'controversial' from the article lead. The reference being used for the word 'controversial' was an article published in a relatively obscure source: Watkins magazine. But only a few edits earlier the reference being used for the 'controversial' word was a BBC article. The BBC reference was swapped for the Watkins reference by another editor*, and then the 'controversial' word was removed by Timothy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Swami_Nithyananda&diff=768970412&oldid=768969459