I shall post the entirety of the message that prompted Guy Macon to post what must be his fifth attempt to explain why he is sooooo unhappy......
If you've never heard of Younes Zarou, that's understandable. He's only been on Wikipedia a week. Seriously.Come Back?
Can you please come back. Younes Zarou (talk) 14:28, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
I shall breeze past what that might mean, because the massive reply it prompted, is comedy gold.
So much so, I'm breaking it down, for comedy purposes.
Thank you for the kind words.
Why is it hidden away? Shouldn't it be prominently displayed on your user pages to assist the hundreds of people who have been left dazed and confused by your absence from their watchlist? Or do you just want any excuse to keep banging on about it? Is it therapeutic or something? Or is it a self harm kind of thing?As I explained at User talk:Guy Macon/Archive 4#Quitting Wikipedia
False statement is false. It doesn't become true if you just keep repeating it. But please do, the Daily Mail journalists and a whole host of other victims of the Wikipedia cult probably think it's fucking hilarious to see the Wikipedia Administrators refusing to warn or even block someone who is repeatedly telling a self serving lie, like we're all supposed to believe that's not normally seen as a serious offence. The benefits of being a celebrity editor, eh?a new rule (addressing someone by their username and avoiding all personal pronouns is forbidden)
Are they refusing to block you because it would show that one of the chief drivers behind the Daily Mail ban is a lying piece of shit? Someone who happily lives in a fantasy world of made up bullshit, when it suits. They needn't wouldn't worry, I think getting blocked for being a transphobic troll has served the same purpose, no?
No you weren't. You were blocked for "intentionally mocking someone's gender, after a clear previous warning not to."and I was blocked without warning for violating it.
And? Perhaps you're imagining some fanciful version of Wikipedia where civility and respect was a thing. If that Wikipedia ever existed, it is long gone. It is now widely accepted that an Administrator can call you a troll and say you are being dishonest, if it is not just some random attack, if it was part of their official business and as long as he has properly accounted for why he holds those views. He has done.The blocking admin also called a troll and a liar
You had your opportunity to dispute it, and it doesn't appear to have worked. The downsides of a hobby where everything comes down to consensus, allegedly. Sometimes Wikipedia is just not fair. Sometimes you feel like you've been screwed over by the Powers That Be. But you're unlikely to garner any sympathy, because you're the person who has done that to many people on Wikipedia, as the very epitome of a powerful editor, and have shown not one ounce of sympathy or remorse.
Well yes, that's why he blocked you. If you're not happy with his service, you know what the policy compliant way of going about that is. Not that I'm complaining about the way you're choosing to go about it instead, since it does rather show you are indeed a dirty little troll in almost everything you do. Someone who whines and complains and lies and generally tries to create an emotional response based on a false premise, rather than follow the rules and offer evidence for claims. Surprising, for someone who has themselves claimed, and as other known trolls who count you as a friend have claimed, is a very literal and rules obsessed person. Could it be that your whole Doh! I am such an autistic fuck, what am I like! routine, is itself, a big fat lie?and accused me of deliberately causing offense
Good for you. I like a person who is proactive. But you have previously admitted to having a mental condition that impairs your understanding of social interactions, so why did you not think to run this approach past a neurotypical, for a sanity check? Especially given you had already been warned to watch your step when referring to this user. For I think everyone who is neurotypical can see your primary problem here, is convincing anyone that you honestly thought that "Fæ, please explain in Fæ's own words your understanding as to why Fæ was blocked. In particular, has Fæ's thinking on this changed since [User talk:Fæ/2020#Blocked]]?" wasn't pure trollery?I honestly thought that avoiding all personal pronouns was a good way to avoid offense, based upon the advice at the Swarthmore College LGBTQ+ page and several similar resources.
This is what is known as a paranoid delusion.If I resume editing Wikipedia articles I believe that yet another new rule will be invented and I will be blocked for violating it.
Is this this good time to remind everyone that Guy Macon is not actually currently blocked. All this utterly deranged bullshit, this pantomime theatre of lunacy, is about what would make him end his VOLUNTARY exile from the asylum.I thought that I had a solution that would allow me to resume editing articles. That solution is:
Maybe it's your mental condition, but to a neurotypical, the obvious question is, why would he? You're still lying about what he did, or at least what he says he did (he blocked you after you ignored a warning). If he steps aside now, he would obviously be admitting that must have been an error. Where is the error? In the eyes of this Administrator, you have already been disruptive. It would be a dereliction of duty for him to ignore future instances. He has rightly said, and nobody is disputing it, if you do this again, you will receive and fully deserve, and indefinite block. The only reason I can think you want him to step aside, is you hope other Administrators will not be so diligent.1. The admin who blocked me without warning agrees -- without in any way apologizing or admitting fault -- to step aside and let other admins deal with any disruptive behavior on my part.
Why haven't you done this then? Is it because you have already been warned, and blocked? Just because you dispute this happened, doesn't mean any other Administrator is obliged to buy into your bullshit, and reset the clock back to what is the starting condition for a novice editor. As you never tire of telling anyone, you're a fifteen year veteran who has apparently done a lot of research and received copious feedback on the proper use of pronouns now, so why would ANYONE buy into this obvious bullshit that you still need to be warned before the blocks start raining down?2. I post a request at WP:AN asking those other admins to ask me to stop if they think I am anywhere near offending someone over gender pronouns, and asking them to block me if I fail to stop on the first warning.
Feel free to do this. If only because it will remind people that the man who pushed for the Daily Mail ban, is so fucked in the head, he needs a computer to help him figure out how not to offend people. Even after he has apparently done all that research and taken on board all that feedback.3. I agree to use the templates listed at template:them rather than trying to figure out myself how to avoid offending someone over gender pronouns.
Oh really? Well, let's have a brief pause to remember that in prior versions, you have said you would only return if the community vacated his block reason and Floquenbeam admitted he was acting out of some kind of malice.In my opinion this would solve the issue and allow me to resume editing articles.
So I guess Guy is not so damaged he understands when he is fighting a lost cause. And it only took him a month to realise nobody was buying what he was selling. There's the Guy Macon the Daily Mail recognises. Tell a fucking big lie, in the hopes a small lie will take hold. The big lie is that the Mail would falsify football scores if it saw a profit in it. The small lie is that nobody can know if Marek Kukula is innocent. Both are obvious lies. You always need to consider the source. And as we now know, the source is a transphobic troll who genuinely believes people really will believe he is right about the injustice of this block. He isn't, and that is why he is going to keep watering down these suppsed conditions of return, until he arrives at something that doesn't seem so humiliating.
Aw, diddums. He has already said of your pathetic last stand, "[he hopes] we don't lose a productive editor, but frankly, that is his decision, not mine." He is quite correct. If Floquenbeam stepping aside is what will make you return, and he won't do it voluntarily, then you know how you can force him to step aside. You won't do it, and nobody else is going to either it seems, because you have no case.Alas, the admin who blocked me without warning refuses to step away and let other admins deal with me.
Yup. "In my mind" is the key phrase here, given all your disclosures about how that mind apparently works. I suggest you run this nonsense past a neurotypical, who will undoubtedly confirm, you are being a massive tit.In my mind this confirms that If I resume editing Wikipedia articles yet another new rule will be invented and I will be blocked for violating it.
Bollocks.So, no, I won't be coming back.
You keep saying this, yet you keep on seizing on any and all opportunity to talk about why you're not contributing, and stating your (ever changing) conditions for a return. Why? Because you want the drama to start and/or continue until your fanciful demands are met. Even though it's been a month and people have clearly decided you just aren't worth it, you still clearly harbour delusions that people care.To those who have expressed support; please don't escalate this. That is not what I want. Just let it go.
Holy shit. Are you the Trump of Wikipedia?
You lost. Get over it. If you are over it, if you don't want people to raise it, there is a simple way to do that:
Shut the fuck up, you whiney little bitch.
This is not what I want, naturally. Seeing you do this shows the world that you are exactly the sort of person who would have done what you did to the Mail. An obsessive, deluded, never capable of admitting wrong or defeat, lunatic bastard.
The community banned the Mail simply to make you stop banging on about it, didn't they? Just to get a bit of peace from the never ending lunacy. Only you didn't, did you.
Delusional.To those who have argued that I really am a liar, a troll, and a transphobe; you got your way. I have stopped editing. Please let it go.
It's all in your head. Other than my good self, who isn't going to let it go because you fucking deserve every single ounce of mental anguish you're going through, the people who agree with this block, stopped talking about it a long time ago. Floquenbeam only keeps piping up, because you keep lying about him. So, y'know, if you want him to let it go, you know what to do.